首页> 外文期刊>International Journal of Environmental Protection and Policy >An Overview of American Interstate Ecological Governance and the Enlightenment for China
【24h】

An Overview of American Interstate Ecological Governance and the Enlightenment for China

机译:美国州际生态治理概述及其对中国的启示

获取原文
           

摘要

The existing US interstate ecological governance system can be divided into three categories according to the governance subject: traditional government governance, inter-governmental cooperation governance and special organizational governance. Traditional ecological governance is a government-led public governance, that is, the use of public power. US interstate eco-governance governance includes administrative control-led environmental regulation, legislative legislative ecological behavior, and judicial system environmental litigation ruling. Interstate issues are essentially intergovernmental relationships, so inter-governmental cooperation mechanisms are the proper meaning of interstate ecological governance. Traditional interstate agreements and central government cooperation governance are two common ways of interstate cooperation governance. The special organization is the Tennessee Valley Authority (TVA), which is a company based in the United States. It is a state-owned company that was established in May 1933 in accordance with the Tennessee Valley Authority Act. Formal operation, it is a regional comprehensive governance and comprehensive development plan, "is the first organized attempt in the history of the United States to skillfully arrange the fate of the entire basin and its residents." The US interstate ecological governance system is effective and relevant. The governance system that basically meets the requirements of multi-center governance plays an active role in dealing with interstate ecological environmental disputes and protection. China and the United States have certain similarities in the field of ecological governance. On the basis of national conditions, China's cross-regional ecological governance can learn from the US's governance experience to achieve "good governance" of cross-regional ecological problems.
机译:根据治理主题,美国现有的州际生态治理体系可以分为三类:传统政府治理,政府间合作治理和特殊组织治理。传统的生态治理是政府主导的公共治理,即使用公共权力。美国的州际生态治理包括行政控制主导的环境法规,立法立法生态行为以及司法系统环境诉讼裁决。州际问题本质上是政府间关系,因此政府间合作机制是州际生态治理的正确含义。传统的州际协议和中央政府合作治理是州际合作治理的两种常见方式。特殊组织是位于美国的田纳西河谷管理局(TVA)。这是一家根据田纳西谷地管理局法案于1933年5月成立的国有公司。正式运作是一项区域全面治理和全面发展计划,“是美国历史上第一次有组织地尝试巧妙地安排整个流域及其居民的命运的有组织努力。”美国的州际生态治理体系是有效和相关的。基本上满足多中心治理要求的治理体系在处理州际生态环境纠纷和保护方面发挥着积极作用。中美在生态治理领域具有某些相似之处。在国情的基础上,中国的跨区域生态治理可以借鉴美国的治理经验,实现跨区域生态问题的“良治”。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号