...
首页> 外文期刊>Indian journal of Anaesthesia >Target-controlled infusion (Propofol) versus inhaled anaesthetic (Sevoflurane) in patients undergoing shoulder arthroscopic surgery
【24h】

Target-controlled infusion (Propofol) versus inhaled anaesthetic (Sevoflurane) in patients undergoing shoulder arthroscopic surgery

机译:肩关节镜手术患者的靶控输注(丙泊酚)与麻醉剂(七氟醚)

获取原文
           

摘要

Background:One of the challenges of anaesthesia for shoulder arthroscopic procedures is the need for controlled hypotension to lessen intra-articular haemorrhage and thereby provide adequate visualisation to the surgeon. Achievement of optimal conditions necessitates several interventions and manipulations by the anaesthesiologist and the surgeon, most of which directly or indirectly involve maintaining intra-operative blood pressure (BP) control.Aim:This study aimed to compare the efficacy and convenience of target controlled infusion (TCI) of propofol and inhalational agent sevoflurane in patients undergoing shoulder arthroscopic surgery after preliminary inter-scalene blockade.Methods:Of thirty four patients studied, seventeen received TCI propofol (target plasma concentration of 3 μg/ml) and an equal number, sevoflurane (1.2-1.5 Minimum Alveolar Concentration). N2O was used in both groups. Systolic, diastolic, mean blood pressures and heart rate were recorded regularly throughout the procedure. All interventions to control BP by the anaesthesiologist and pump manipulation requested by the surgeon were recorded. The volume of saline irrigant used and the haemoglobin (Hb) content of the return fluid were measured.Results:TCI propofol could achieve lower systolic, mean BP levels and the number of interventions required was also lower as compared to the sevoflurane group. The number of patients with measurable Hb was lower in the TCI propofol group and this translated into better visualisation of the joint space. A higher volume of saline irrigant was required in the sevoflurane group. No immediate peri-operative anaesthetic complications were noted in either category.Conclusion:TCI propofol appears to be superior to and more convenient than sevoflurane anaesthesia in inter-scalene blocked patients undergoing shoulder arthroscopy.
机译:背景:肩关节镜手术麻醉的挑战之一是需要控制性降压以减轻关节内出血,从而为外科医生提供足够的可视化效果。为了达到最佳条件,麻醉师和外科医生需要进行多种干预和操作,其中大多数直接或间接涉及维持术中血压(BP)的控制。目的:本研究旨在比较目标控制输注的疗效和便利性(方法:对34名接受研究的患者中,有17名接受了TCI异丙酚(目标血浆浓度为3μg/ ml)和等量的七氟醚(七氟醚(TCI)) 1.2-1.5最低肺泡浓度)。两组均使用N2O。在整个过程中定期记录收缩压,舒张压,平均血压和心率。记录麻醉医生控制血压的所有干预措施以及外科医生要求的泵操作。结果:TCI异丙酚可达到较低的收缩压,平均BP水平,所需干预的次数也比七氟醚组低。在TCI丙泊酚组中,可测量的Hb患者人数较少,这可以更好地显示关节间隙。七氟醚组需要更大剂量的盐水冲洗液。结论:TCI丙泊酚似乎比七氟醚麻醉对肩关节镜检查的斜角肌阻滞患者具有更好的麻醉效果,并且比七氟醚麻醉更方便。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号