...
首页> 外文期刊>International Journal of Basic & Clinical Pharmacology >Item analysis of multiple choice questions of undergraduate pharmacology examinations in a medical college in Belagavi, Karnataka, India
【24h】

Item analysis of multiple choice questions of undergraduate pharmacology examinations in a medical college in Belagavi, Karnataka, India

机译:印度卡纳塔克邦Belagavi医学院的本科药理学考试的多项选择题的项目分析

获取原文
           

摘要

Background: Multiple choice questions (MCQs) are a common method of assessment of medical students. The quality of MCQs is determined by three parameters such as difficulty index (DIF I), discrimination index (DI), and Distractor efficiency (DE). Item analysis is a valuable yet relatively simple procedure, performed after the examination that provides information regarding the reliability and validity of a test item. The objective of this study was to perform an item analysis of MCQs for testing their validity parameters. Methods: 50 items consisting of 150 distractors were selected from the formative exams. A correct response to an item was awarded one mark with no negative marking for incorrect response. Each item was analysed for three parameters such as DIF I, DI, and DE. Results: A total of 50 items consisting of 150 Distractor s were analysed. DIF I of 31 (62%) items were in the acceptable range (DIF I= 30-70%) and 30 had ‘good to excellent’ (DI >0.25). 10 (20%) items were too easy and 9 (18%) items were too difficult (DIF I <30%). There were 4 items with 6 non-functional Distractor s (NFDs), while the rest 46 items did not have any NFDs. Conclusions: Item analysis is a valuable tool as it helps us to retain the valuable MCQs and discard or modify the items which are not useful. It also helps in increasing our skills in test construction and identifies the specific areas of course content which need greater emphasis or clarity.
机译:背景:选择题(MCQ)是评估医学生的一种常见方法。 MCQ的质量由三个参数确定,例如难度指数(DIF I),鉴别指数(DI)和干扰力效率(DE)。项目分析是一种有价值但相对简单的过程,在检查后执行,可提供有关测试项目的可靠性和有效性的信息。这项研究的目的是对MCQ进行项目分析,以测试其有效性参数。方法:从形成性考试中选择了由150个干扰物组成的50个项目。对某项商品的正确回答将被授予一个分数,而对于不正确的回答则不会给予任何负面评分。分析了每个项目的三个参数,例如DIF I,DI和DE。结果:总共分析了50个项目,其中包括150个Distractor。 31个项目(62%)的DIF I处于可接受的范围内(DIF I = 30-70%),而30个项目的“优良至优良”(DI> 0.25)。 10(20%)项太容易了,而9(18%)项太难了(DIF I <30%)。有4个项目带有6个非功能性干扰物(NFD),而其余46个项目没有任何NFD。结论:项目分析是一种有价值的工具,因为它可以帮助我们保留有价值的MCQ,并丢弃或修改无用的项目。它还有助于提高我们在测试构建中的技能,并确定课程内容的特定领域,这些领域需要得到更大的强调或明确。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号