...
首页> 外文期刊>International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity >Effects of different discount levels on healthy products coupled with a healthy choice label, special offer label or both: results from a web-based supermarket experiment
【24h】

Effects of different discount levels on healthy products coupled with a healthy choice label, special offer label or both: results from a web-based supermarket experiment

机译:不同折扣水平对健康产品以及健康选择标签和/或特价标签的影响:基于网络的超市实验的结果

获取原文
           

摘要

Background Two strategies commonly recommended to improve population diets include food labels and food taxes/subsidies. The aim of this study was to examine the effects of both strategies separately and in combination. Findings An experiment with a 3x3 factorial design was conducted, including: three levels of price reduction (10%; 25%; and 50%) x three labels (‘special offer’, ‘healthy choice’ and ‘special offer & healthy choice’) on healthy foods defined following the Choices front-of-pack nutrition label. N?=?109 participants completed the experiment by conducting a typical weekly shop for their household at a three-dimensional web-based supermarket. Data were analysed using analysis of covariance. Participants receiving a 50% price discount purchased significantly more healthy foods for their household in a typical weekly shop than the 10% discount (+8.7 items; 95%CI?=?3.8-13.6) and the 25% discount group (+7.7 items; 95%CI?=?2.74 – 12.6). However, the proportion of healthy foods was not significantly higher and the discounts lead to an increased amount of energy purchased. No significant effects of the labels were found. Conclusion This study brings some relevant insights into the effects of price discounts on healthier foods coupled with different labels and shows that price effects over shadowed food labels. However, price discounts seem to have ambiguous effects; they do encourage the purchase of healthy products, but also lead to increased energy purchases. More research is needed to examine how pricing strategies can work in directing consumers towards interchanging unhealthier options for healthier alternatives.
机译:背景技术通常建议的两种改善人口饮食的策略包括食品标签和食品税/补贴。这项研究的目的是分别检查和结合两种策略的效果。结果进行了3x3析因设计的实验,包括:三个级别的降价(10%; 25%;和50%)x三个标签(“特价”,“健康选择”和“特价和健康选择”) )上按照“选择包装”营养标签定义的健康食品。 N = 109位参与者通过在基于三维Web的超级市场为他们的家庭开设一个典型的每周商店来完成实验。使用协方差分析对数据进行分析。享受50%折扣的参与者在典型的每周商店中为家庭购买的健康食品要比10%折扣(+8.7项; 95%CI?=?3.8-13.6)和25%折扣组(+7.7项)多得多。 ; 95%CI?=?2.74-12.6)。但是,健康食品的比例并没有明显增加,折扣导致购买的能量增加。没有发现标签的显着影响。结论本研究为价格折扣对健康食品和不同标签的影响提供了一些相关见解,并显示了价格影响超过阴影食品标签。但是,价格折扣似乎有歧义。它们确实鼓励人们购买健康的产品,但也导致能源购买量增加。需要进行更多研究,以研究定价策略如何引导消费者转向使用更不健康的选择,以换取更健康的选择。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号