首页> 外文期刊>International Journal of Advanced Information Technology >Traditional Versus Blended Learning Method: a Comparative Study on its Effectiveness in Business Communication Course
【24h】

Traditional Versus Blended Learning Method: a Comparative Study on its Effectiveness in Business Communication Course

机译:传统与混合学习法:在商务交流课程中的有效性比较研究

获取原文
           

摘要

This article presents a descriptive comparative study on two methods of teaching, the traditional andblended learning pedagogical approach in a Business Communication course. Forty-four (44) studentsfrom the two controlled groups were enrolled in the course for the first semester of school year 2017-2018participated in the study. The findings indicated that respondents’ performance in ENGL118 (EnglishComposition) had an effect on their performance in BUS261(Business Communication) and there was asignificant positive relationship between year level and final grade in BUS261. Therefore, it was concludedthat the year level and grade in ENGL118 have correlationson student’sperformance in BUS261. Theresults of the assessments of the two groups were compared and indicated a significant difference in theresults which was influenced by respondents’ year level and mode of conducting assessments. It is furtherconcluded, that if the characteristics of both groups were the same, blended would have been moreeffective than the traditional method.This study recommends adopting the blended pedagogical approachnot only in BUS261 course but also to other courses as applicable.
机译:本文对商务教学课程中的两种教学方法(传统的和混合的学习教学法)进行了描述性的比较研究。来自两个对照组的四十四(44)名学生参加了该研究的2017-2018学年第一学期课程。调查结果表明,受访者在ENGL118(英语写作)中的表现会影响他们在BUS261(商务传播)中的表现,并且BUS261的年级和最终成绩之间存在显着的正相关关系。因此,可以得出结论,ENGL118中的年级和年级与学生在BUS261中的表现相关。比较了两组评估的结果,并指出结果的显着差异受受访者的年级和评估方式的影响。进一步得出结论,如果两组的特征相同,则混合将比传统方法更有效。本研究建议不仅在BUS261课程中采用混合教学法,在其他适用课程中也应采用混合教学法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号