...
首页> 外文期刊>Insights >Tweeting into the void?: creating a UK library Twitter list and analyzing best practice – successes and myths
【24h】

Tweeting into the void?: creating a UK library Twitter list and analyzing best practice – successes and myths

机译:推文到空?:创建英国图书馆的Twitter列表并分析最佳实践-成功与神话

获取原文
           

摘要

Despite the vast amount of research into social media use by libraries, no research has been made into its use by smaller UK libraries. Although many statements have been made regarding the time- and cost-saving nature of social media, there is a lack of comparative research about its usefulness in different types of library. To address these points, this study gathered statistics from 1,425 library accounts on the social media tool Twitter. Five smaller libraries were selected for a more in-depth metric analysis and interview regarding their accounts and their measuring of return on investment (ROI). The study found that while many libraries are using Twitter, academic libraries were the first to sign up en masse. Despite clear best practice criteria, many accounts are not utilizing Twitter to its fullest capacity. The two greatest influencing factors on followers were found to be the amount of time since the account’s registration and the type of library. When interviewed, the smaller libraries in this study were shown to be following best practice criteria, but were working outside these parameters to create unique initiatives. However, the five interviewed libraries have not been recording any metrics, data or examples of successful tweets on social media, making it difficult to measure ROI. Furthermore, the libraries interviewed have been reaching followers who are not library users. This alters libraries’ social media strategies and is something that should be part of the discussion surrounding library use of social media.
机译:尽管图书馆对社交媒体的使用进行了大量研究,但英国的小型图书馆尚未对其使用进行任何研究。尽管已经就社交媒体的节省时间和成本的性质发表了许多声明,但缺乏关于其在不同类型图书馆中的实用性的比较研究。为了解决这些问题,本研究从社交媒体工具Twitter上的1,425个图书馆帐户中收集了统计数据。选择了五个较小的图书馆进行更深入的指标分析,并就其账目和投资回报率(ROI)进行访谈。研究发现,尽管许多图书馆都在使用Twitter,但学术图书馆却是第一个大规模注册的图书馆。尽管有明确的最佳实践标准,但许多帐户并未充分利用Twitter。发现对追随者的两个最大影响因素是自该帐户注册以来的时间长短和图书馆的类型。在接受采访时,该研究中较小的图书馆被证明遵循最佳实践标准,但在这些参数之外工作以创建独特的计划。但是,这五个受采访的图书馆尚未在社交媒体上记录任何指标,数据或成功推文的示例,因此很难衡量ROI。此外,受访的图书馆已经吸引了不是图书馆用户的追随者。这改变了图书馆的社交媒体策略,应该成为围绕图书馆使用社交媒体的讨论的一部分。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号