...
首页> 外文期刊>Informatica Economica >NoSQL and SQL Databases for Mobile Applications. Case Study: MongoDB versus PostgreSQL
【24h】

NoSQL and SQL Databases for Mobile Applications. Case Study: MongoDB versus PostgreSQL

机译:用于移动应用程序的NoSQL和SQL数据库。案例研究:MongoDB与PostgreSQL

获取原文
           

摘要

Compared with “classical” web, multi-tier applications, mobile applications have common and specific requirements concerning data persistence and processing. In mobile apps, database features can be distinctly analyzed for the client (minimalistic, isolated, memory-only) and the server (data rich, centralized, distributed, synchronized and disk-based) layers. Currently, a few lite relational database products reign the persistence for client platforms of mobile applications. There are two main objectives of this paper. First is to investigate storage options for major mobile platforms. Second is to point out some major differences between SQL and NoSQL datastores in terms of deployment, data model, schema design, data definition and manipulation. As NoSQL movement lacks standardization, from NoSQL products family MongoDB was chosen as reference, due to its strengths and popularity among developers. PostgreSQL serves the position of SQL DBMSs representative due to its popularity and conformity with SQL standards.
机译:与“经典” Web多层应用程序相比,移动应用程序在数据持久性和处理方面有共同的特定要求。在移动应用程序中,可以针对客户端(极简,隔离,仅内存)和服务器(数据丰富,集中,分布式,同步和基于磁盘)层分别分析数据库功能。当前,一些精简的关系数据库产品主导了移动应用程序客户端平台的持久性。本文有两个主要目标。首先是研究主要移动平台的存储选项。其次是指出SQL和NoSQL数据存储之间在部署,数据模型,架构设计,数据定义和操作方面的一些主要区别。由于NoSQL运动缺乏标准化,因此从NoSQL产品家族中选择MongoDB作为参考,因为它的优势和在开发人员中的普及。 PostgreSQL因其受欢迎程度和与SQL标准的一致性而在SQL DBMS的代表职位中占据一席之地。

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号