首页> 外文期刊>Indian journal of orthopaedics >Percutaneous vertebroplasty and percutaneous balloon kyphoplasty for osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture: A metaanalysis
【24h】

Percutaneous vertebroplasty and percutaneous balloon kyphoplasty for osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture: A metaanalysis

机译:经皮椎体成形术和经皮球囊后凸成形术治疗骨质疏松性椎体压缩性骨折:荟萃分析

获取原文
           

摘要

Background:Osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture (OVCF) is the most common complication of osteoporosis, however, debate persists over which procedure of percutaneous vertebroplasty (PVP) or balloon kyphoplasty (BKP) is a better treatment. We performed a metaanalysis of prospective, randomized controlled and clinical controlled trials of PVP and BKP to determine the efficacy and safety for the treatment of OVCFs to reach a relatively conclusive answer.Materials and Methods:We searched computerized databases comparing efficacy and safety of PVP and BKP in osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures. These reports included pain relief, functional capacity (Oswestry disability index [ODI] score), anterior vertebral body height (AVBH), kyphotic angle and complications (i.e. cement leakage, incident fractures). Studies were assessed for methodological bias and potential reasons for heterogeneity were explored.Results:As of March 15, 2013, a PubMed search resulted in 761 articles, of which eleven studies encompassing 789 patients, met the inclusion criteria. The average length of followup is 17 months and 4.6% patients were lost to followup. Results of metaanalysis indicated that BKP is more effective for short term pain relief. In addition, BKP is more effective to restore the AVBH (anterior vertebral body height), ODI and kyphotic angle of OVCFs. Moreover, BKP need more polymethylmethacrylate amount.Conclusions:In terms of better effectiveness of BKP procedure, we believe BKP to be superior over PVP for the treatment of osteoporotic VCFs.
机译:背景:骨质疏松性椎体压缩性骨折(OVCF)是骨质疏松症最常见的并发症,然而,关于哪种方法经皮椎体成形术(PVP)或球囊后凸成形术(BKP)是一种更好的治疗方法仍存在争议。我们对PVP和BKP的前瞻性,随机对照和临床对照试验进行了荟萃分析,以确定治疗OVCF的疗效和安全性以得出相对结论性的方法。材料和方法:我们搜索了计算机数据库,比较了PVP和BKP在骨质疏松性椎体压缩性骨折中。这些报告包括疼痛缓解,功能能力(Oswestry残疾指数[ODI]评分),椎体前高(AVBH),后凸角和并发症(即水泥渗漏,骨折)。结果:截至2013年3月15日,PubMed搜索共761篇文章,其中包括789名患者的11项研究符合纳入标准。平均随访时间为17个月,有4.6%的患者失去随访。荟萃分析的结果表明,BKP对于短期缓解疼痛更有效。另外,BKP更有效地恢复OVCF的AVBH(前椎体高度),ODI和后凸角。结论:就更好的BKP手术效果而言,我们认为BKP在治疗骨质疏松性VCF方面优于PVP。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号