首页> 外文期刊>Indian Journal of Ophthalmology >Internal limiting membrane peel: Does it change the success rate of primary vitrectomy without belt buckle in rhegmatogenous retinal detachments?
【24h】

Internal limiting membrane peel: Does it change the success rate of primary vitrectomy without belt buckle in rhegmatogenous retinal detachments?

机译:内部限制膜剥落:它是否会改变原发性玻璃体切除术在带源性视网膜脱离中没有安全带扣的成功率?

获取原文
           

摘要

Purpose: To compare the anatomic success of pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) after internal limiting membrane (ILM) peeling at macular area and macular plus peripapillary area versus no peeling in rhegmatogenous retinal detachments (RRD). Methods: A prospective observational study between July 2014 and March 2017 conducted on 289 eyes of 287 patients with RRD were randomly assigned to three treatment procedures, viz., PPV with no ILM peeling, PPV with macular peeling, and PPV with macular plus peripapillary peeling. Recurrent RD (ReRD) was treated as an event and accordingly the overall primary (PS) and final success (FS) rates were obtained. The risk of ReRD associated with peeling procedures after adjusting for risk factors were obtained using Cox-proportional hazard analysis. Results: The PS percentage for no peel, macular, and macular plus peripapillary procedures were 77.78% (70/90), 82.18% (83/101), and 94.89% (93/98; maximum), respectively, which was statistically significant with a P value of 0.003. The FS percentage for no peel, macular, and macular plus peripapillary were 93.33%, 95.04%, and 100%, respectively, which was significantly different with a P value of 0.048. With reference to no peeling, the adjusted hazard ratio for macular peeling was 0.841 [95% CI: 0.44–1.60] while 0.235 [95% CI: 0.088–0.626] for macular plus peripapillary peeling. Conclusion: The anatomic success rate of PPV with macular plus peripapillary ILM peeling was significantly higher as compared to no peel category. The hazard of ReRD in patients undergoing macular plus peripapillary peel was significantly reduced as compared to no peel procedure.
机译:目的:比较黄斑区和黄斑加上乳头周围区域的内部限制膜(ILM)剥离后的平面内玻璃体切除术(PPV)的解剖学成功与流产性视网膜脱离(RRD)没有剥离的成功率。方法:对2014年7月至2017年3月在287例RRD患者中289眼进行的一项前瞻性观察研究,将其随机分为三种治疗方法,即无ILM剥脱的PPV,有黄斑剥脱的PPV以及有黄斑加乳头及乳头周围剥离的PPV 。复发性RD(ReRD)被视为事件,因此获得了总体主要(PS)和最终成功(FS)率。使用Cox比例风险分析获得校正风险因素后与剥皮程序相关的ReRD风险。结果:无剥离,黄斑和黄斑加乳头周围手术的PS百分比分别为77.78%(70/90),82.18%(83/101)和94.89%(93/98;最大值),具有统计学意义P值为0.003。无果皮,黄斑和黄斑加上乳头周围的FS百分比分别为93.33%,95.04%和100%,这具有显着差异,P值为0.048。关于不脱皮,黄斑加乳头状周缘脱皮的经调整的危险比为0.841 [95%CI:0.44-1.60],而0.235 [95%CI:0.088-0.626]。结论:与无剥离类别相比,黄斑+乳头周围ILM剥离PPV的解剖学成功率显着更高。与不进行剥离手术相比,在接受黄斑加乳头周围剥离的患者中,ReRD的危险性大大降低。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号