首页> 外文期刊>American Journal of Industrial and Business Management >Strategic Fast Supply Demand-Chains in a Network Context: Opportunistic Practices That Can Destroy Supply Chain Systems
【24h】

Strategic Fast Supply Demand-Chains in a Network Context: Opportunistic Practices That Can Destroy Supply Chain Systems

机译:网络环境下的战略性快速供应需求链:可能破坏供应链系统的机会主义实践

获取原文
           

摘要

This paper has a conceptual character and explores an approach between transaction cost analysis theory and network theory when applied to supply chains in a broader context: industrial management research. This approach raises the assumptions that fast supply chains, i.e., supply chains made of short time relationships and multiple partners can contribute to destroying trust and collaboration between companies, ending up by stressing actual systems’ arrangements in somehow stable supply chainsetwork chains. As a consequence, transforming them in distrust arrangements and thus giving birth to new (old) approaches based only on transaction cost analysis theory: opportunism and limited rationality as the continuum for relationships between companies in a globalized world with numerous potential agents/companies that can play several roles. Too high levels of entropy can show this reality: the number of potential players (suppliers, customers or complementors) with theoretically equal probability of establishing partnerships with one focal company in a supply chain or network arrangement is excessive in relation to the number of current suppliers, customers and complementors, and for that reason, the focal company is somehow dissipating energy in identifying several potential players and in a state of giving one way or another equal importance to them all, situation that can affect stable relations with current partners. Theoretically, this will create what looks like strategic fast supply—demand chains or network chains: fast because they are rapidly settle down and fast as they are also rapidly dismantled. Those arrangements are the ones responsible for several possible and fast relations (internalizing resources from the environment and/or externalizing resources to the environment) but, anyway, contributing to loose trust, credibility and running against profitable games with partners already involved with focal companies in stable supply chains.
机译:本文具有概念性,并探讨了将交易成本分析理论和网络理论应用于更广泛的上下文中的一种方法:工业管理研究。这种方法提出了这样的假设,即快速的供应链,即由短时关系和多个合作伙伴组成的供应链,可能会破坏公司之间的信任和协作,最终会通过强调稳定的供应链/网络链中的实际系统安排来结束。结果,以不信任的方式对它们进行了改造,从而仅基于交易成本分析理论就诞生了新的(旧的)方法:机会主义和有限的理性是全球化世界中公司与众多潜在代理商/公司之间可以建立联系的连续性扮演几个角色。熵水平过高可能表明存在此现实:与供应商或网络安排中的一家重点公司建立合作伙伴关系的理论上可能性相等的潜在参与者(供应商,客户或互补方)的数量相对于当前供应商的数量而言过多,客户和补充者,因此,焦点公司不遗余力地确定了几个潜在参与者,并处于一种对他们全部或另一种同等重要的状态,这种情况会影响与当前合作伙伴的稳定关系。从理论上讲,这将创建看起来像战略性的快速供应-需求链或网络链:快速,因为它们很快就安定下来,而快速又随着它们的拆除而迅速。这些安排是负责几种可能和快速关系的安排(将环境中的资源内部化和/或将环境中的资源外部化),但是无论如何,这会导致松散的信任,信誉并与已经与焦点公司合作的合作伙伴竞争可盈利的游戏稳定的供应链。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号