...
【24h】

Equality, Social Inclusion and School Funding

机译:平等,社会包容和学校资助

获取原文
           

摘要

Private schools are, by their very nature, exclusive. Public schools, in contrast, must cater to all. Now some private schools are still more exclusive than others – Abbotsleigh, Knox Grammar or St. Josephs are part of an elite club to which the Catholic parish school does not belong. Yet, where once there was sectarian and even class division in the ranks of private schools, there is now a unified voice. That is what guaranteed public funding of private schools has produced. Many of you will recall that some of the loudest voices against government funding of private schools in the 1960s were spokesmen for the elite Protestant schools, church leaders frightened of the Catholic hordes who would be granted access to some social wealth if Government was to prop up the parish school. When Whitlam brought in generous school funding, however, a gravy train beckoned and the elite private schools jumped on board. Paradoxically, as greater levels of funding have shifted to the private school sector, the social divide has become much starker than it was in the 1960s. One of the reasons that Australia is a less equal society than it was in the 1960s is the shift from public to private schools aided by Government policy spawned under the false rubric of choice.
机译:就其性质而言,私立学校是排他性的。相反,公立学校必须迎合所有人。现在,有些私立学校比其他私立学校更独具一格-Abbotsleigh,诺克斯语法或圣约瑟夫斯是天主教教区学校不属于的精英俱乐部的一部分。但是,在私立学校中曾经有宗派甚至阶级划分的地方,现在有了统一的声音。这就是保证私立学校获得公共资金的原因。你们中的许多人会记得,反对政府为私立学校提供资金的最响亮的声音是1960年代精英新教学校的代言人,教堂的领导者对天主教徒大为恐惧,如果政府支持,他们将获得一些社会财富教区学校。但是,当惠特兰(Whitlam)筹集了慷慨的学校资金时,一列肉汁火车招手,精英私立学校跳上了船。矛盾的是,随着越来越多的资金转移到私立学校部门,社会鸿沟比1960年代更加明显。与1960年代相比,澳大利亚的社会不平等的原因之一是,在错误的选择题下产生的政府政策的帮助下,公立学校转为私立学校。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号