...
首页> 外文期刊>Implementation Science >Applying psychological theories to evidence-based clinical practice: identifying factors predictive of placing preventive fissure sealants
【24h】

Applying psychological theories to evidence-based clinical practice: identifying factors predictive of placing preventive fissure sealants

机译:将心理学理论应用于循证临床实践:确定预测放置预防性裂缝封闭剂的因素

获取原文
           

摘要

Background Psychological models are used to understand and predict behaviour in a wide range of settings, but have not been consistently applied to health professional behaviours, and the contribution of differing theories is not clear. This study explored the usefulness of a range of models to predict an evidence-based behaviour -- the placing of fissure sealants. Methods Measures were collected by postal questionnaire from a random sample of general dental practitioners (GDPs) in Scotland. Outcomes were behavioural simulation (scenario decision-making), and behavioural intention. Predictor variables were from the Theory of Planned Behaviour (TPB), Social Cognitive Theory (SCT), Common Sense Self-regulation Model (CS-SRM), Operant Learning Theory (OLT), Implementation Intention (II), Stage Model, and knowledge (a non-theoretical construct). Multiple regression analysis was used to examine the predictive value of each theoretical model individually. Significant constructs from all theories were then entered into a 'cross theory' stepwise regression analysis to investigate their combined predictive value Results Behavioural simulation - theory level variance explained was: TPB 31%; SCT 29%; II 7%; OLT 30%. Neither CS-SRM nor stage explained significant variance. In the cross theory analysis, habit (OLT), timeline acute (CS-SRM), and outcome expectancy (SCT) entered the equation, together explaining 38% of the variance. Behavioural intention - theory level variance explained was: TPB 30%; SCT 24%; OLT 58%, CS-SRM 27%. GDPs in the action stage had significantly higher intention to place fissure sealants. In the cross theory analysis, habit (OLT) and attitude (TPB) entered the equation, together explaining 68% of the variance in intention. Summary The study provides evidence that psychological models can be useful in understanding and predicting clinical behaviour. Taking a theory-based approach enables the creation of a replicable methodology for identifying factors that may predict clinical behaviour and so provide possible targets for knowledge translation interventions. Results suggest that more evidence-based behaviour may be achieved by influencing beliefs about the positive outcomes of placing fissure sealants and building a habit of placing them as part of patient management. However a number of conceptual and methodological challenges remain.
机译:背景技术心理学模型用于理解和预测各种情况下的行为,但并未始终如一地应用于健康专业人员的行为,并且不清楚不同理论的作用。这项研究探索了各种模型对预测基于证据的行为(裂缝密封剂的放置)的有用性。方法通过邮政调查表从苏格兰普通牙科医生(GDP)的随机样本中收集措施。结果是行为模拟(场景决策)和行为意图。预测变量来自计划行为理论(TPB),社会认知理论(SCT),常识自我调节模型(CS-SRM),操作学习理论(OLT),实施意图(II),阶段模型和知识(非理论构造)。多元回归分析被用来检验每个理论模型的预测价值。然后,将来自所有理论的重要结构输入到“交叉理论”逐步回归分析中,以研究其组合的预测值。结果行为模拟-理论水平的解释为:TPB 31%; SCT 29%; II 7%; OLT 30%。 CS-SRM和阶段均未解释显着差异。在交叉理论分析中,习惯(OLT),急性时间轴(CS-SRM)和预期结果(SCT)进入方程式,共同解释了38%的方差。行为意图-理论水平的差异解释为:TPB 30%; SCT 24%; OLT 58%,CS-SRM 27%。在行动阶段的国内生产总值显示了放置裂缝密封胶的明显更高的意愿。在交叉理论分析中,习惯(OLT)和态度(TPB)输入了等式,共同解释了意向性差异的68%。总结这项研究提供了证据,表明心理模型可以用于理解和预测临床行为。采用基于理论的方法可以创建可复制的方法,以识别可预测临床行为的因素,从而为知识翻译干预措施提供可能的目标。结果表明,通过影响关于放置裂隙密封剂的积极结果的信念,并养成将其作为患者管理的一部分的习惯,可以实现更多基于证据的行为。但是,仍然存在许多概念和方法上的挑战。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号