首页> 外文期刊>Indian Journal of Critical Care Medicine >Determining and comparing predictive and intensity value of severity scores – “Sequential organ failure assessment score,” “Acute physiology and chronic health Evaluation 4,” and “Poisoning severity score” – in short-term clinical outcome of patients with poisoning in an ICU
【24h】

Determining and comparing predictive and intensity value of severity scores – “Sequential organ failure assessment score,” “Acute physiology and chronic health Evaluation 4,” and “Poisoning severity score” – in short-term clinical outcome of patients with poisoning in an ICU

机译:在ICU中毒患者的短期临床结局中,确定和比较严重程度评分的预测值和强度值–“顺序器官衰竭评估评分”,“急性生理和慢性健康评估4”和“中毒严重程度评分”

获取原文
           

摘要

Introduction: Today, poisoning is one of the problems of society and it is always one of the ten leading causes of death among youth. This study aimed to determine and compare the predictive and intensity value of three standard criteria of “Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score,” “Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) 4,” and “Poisoning Severity Score (PSS)” in short-term clinical outcome of poisoned patients. Methods: The prospective study conducted on 120 patients of critical care units. Data were collected using a demographic form and three criteria forms. The researcher was visiting the critical care unit daily and was filling out the demographic form of each patient in the first 24 h of hospital admission. The data were analyzed using SPSS version 16. Results: The results showed the mean age of patients was 35.73 ± 18.46 years with the most frequency among male patients (66.7%). The mean of criteria scores of “SOFA score,” “APACHE 4,” and “PSS” was 7.3 ± 2.97, P = 0.009; 62.43 ± 12.48, P = 0.58; and 2.4 ± 0.5, P = 0.001, respectively. The accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values, and area under the curve of “SOFA score,” “APACHE 4,” and “PSS” were 86.2, 70.6, 94.4, 98.6, 36.2, 0.897; 83.5, 90.2, 44.4, 90.2, 44.4, 0.808; and 16.7, 100, 2, 100, 15.3, 0.786, respectively. Predicted mortality rate in “SOFA score” and “APACHE 4” was 18.7% ±20.2% and 2.63% ±2.6%, respectively. Real mortality rate, predictive duration of hospitalization by APACHE 4 criteria, and real duration of hospitalization were 15%, 1.79 ± 1.35, and 4.04 ± 4.08, respectively. Conclusion: The study showed that “SOFA score” was more predictive in clinical outcomes due to poisoning and it is recommended to poisoning centers as effective criteria.
机译:简介:今天,中毒是社会的问题之一,它始终是青年死亡的十大主要原因之一。这项研究旨在确定和比较“连续器官衰竭评估(SOFA)评分”,“急性生理与慢性健康评估(APACHE)4”和“中毒严重度评分(PSS)”这三个标准标准的预测值和强度值。在中毒患者的短期临床结果中。方法:前瞻性研究对120名重症监护病房患者进行。使用人口统计学形式和三个标准形式收集数据。研究人员每天都在访问重症监护病房,并在入院的最初24小时内填写每位患者的人口统计表格。使用SPSS 16版对数据进行分析。结果:结果显示,患者的平均年龄为35.73±18.46岁,其中男性患者的发生频率最高(66.7%)。 “ SOFA得分”,“ APACHE 4”和“ PSS”的标准得分的平均值为7.3±2.97,P = 0.009; 62.43±12.48,P = 0.58;和2.4±0.5,P = 0.001。 “ SOFA评分”,“ APACHE 4”和“ PSS”曲线的准确度,敏感性,特异性,阳性和阴性预测值和曲线下面积分别为86.2、70.6、94.4、98.6、36.2、0.897; 83.5、90.2、44.4、90.2、44.4、0.808;和16.7、100、2、100、15.3、0.786。 “ SOFA评分”和“ APACHE 4”的预测死亡率分别为18.7%±20.2%和2.63%±2.6%。实际死亡率,按APACHE 4标准预测的住院时间和实际住院时间分别为15%,1.79±1.35和4.04±4.08。结论:该研究表明,“ SOFA评分”在中毒后的临床结局中更具预测性,因此建议中毒中心作为有效标准。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号