...
首页> 外文期刊>IDS Bulletin >Donors' Responses to Arab Uprisings: Old Medicine in New Bottles?
【24h】

Donors' Responses to Arab Uprisings: Old Medicine in New Bottles?

机译:捐助者对阿拉伯起义的反应:新瓶装旧药?

获取原文
           

摘要

This article examines Western donors' reactions to the Arab uprisings and whether there has been a radical departure, since January 2011, from previous modes of engagement. It takes the EU and USA as case studies of the failure of aid policies to promote democracy prior to the uprisings, and questions whether a new approach has been adopted after the demise of Mubarak in Egypt. It argues that for the EU, positive conditionality is seen as a central element in reforming funding policies while for the USA, there seems to be no significant change in the funding policy. The highly restrictive political and cultural context affecting international agency has not changed after the ousting of the former regime, nor have the underlying factors influencing the direction of foreign funding in the region changed. In short, what this article concludes is that we are far from witnessing a paradigm shift.
机译:本文研究了西方捐助者对阿拉伯起义的反应,以及自2011年1月以来是否与以前的参与模式发生了根本性的偏离。它以欧盟和美国为例,分析了起义前援助政策未能促进民主的案例,并质疑埃及穆巴拉克(Mubarak)死后是否采用了新的方法。它认为,对于欧盟来说,积极的条件性被视为改革供资政策的核心要素,而对美国而言,供资政策似乎没有重大变化。在前任政权被罢免后,影响国际机构的高度限制的政治和文化环境没有改变,影响该地区外国资金方向的基本因素也没有改变。简而言之,本文得出的结论是,我们离见证范式转变还很远。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号