首页> 外文期刊>Arquivos de Gastroenterologia >Seguran?a e eficácia do uso de cianoacrilato + coil guiado por ultrassom endoscópico versus técnica convencional de cianoacrilato no tratamento de varizes gástricas: um ensaio clínico randomizado
【24h】

Seguran?a e eficácia do uso de cianoacrilato + coil guiado por ultrassom endoscópico versus técnica convencional de cianoacrilato no tratamento de varizes gástricas: um ensaio clínico randomizado

机译:使用氰基丙烯酸酯+内窥镜超声引导线圈与常规氰基丙烯酸酯技术治疗胃静脉曲张的安全性和有效性:一项随机临床试验

获取原文
           

摘要

BACKGROUND: One of the most feared complications with the use of cyanoacrylate for treatment of gastric varices is the occurrence of potentially life-threatening systemic embolism. Thus, endoscopists are turning towards new techniques, including endoscopic coiling, as a potentially safer and more effective treatment option. However, no studies have been performed comparing the two techniques. OBJECTIVE: This study aims to compare the safety and efficacy of endoscopic ultrasound guided coil and cyanoacrylate injection versus the conventional technique of injection of cyanoacrylate alone. DESIGN: A pilot randomized controlled trial. METHODS: Patients randomized into group I were treated with coil and cyanoacrylate, and those in group II with cyanoacrylate alone. Flow within the varix was evaluated immediately after the treatment session and one month following initial treatment. If thrombosis was confirmed, additional follow-up was performed 4 and 10 months following initial treatment. All patients underwent a thoracic computerized tomography scan after the procedure. RESULTS: A total of 32 patients, 16 in each group, were followed for an average of 9.9 months (range 1-26 months). Immediately after the procedure, 6 (37.5%) group-I patients and 8 (50%) group-II patients presented total flow reduction in the treated vessel ( P =0.476). After 30 days, 11 (73.3%) group-I patients and 12 (75%) group-II patients were found to have varix thrombosis. In both groups, the majority of patients required only one single session for varix obliteration (73.3% in group I versus 80% in group II). Asymptomatic pulmonary embolism occurred in 4 (25%) group-I patients and 8 (50%) group-II patients ( P =0.144). No significant difference between the groups was observed. CONCLUSION: There is no statistical difference between endoscopic ultrasound guided coils plus cyanoacrylate versus conventional cyanoacrylate technique in relation to the incidence of embolism. However, a greater tendency towards embolism was observed in the group treated using the conventional technique. Both techniques have similar efficacy in the obliteration of varices. Given the small sample size of our pilot data, our results are insufficient to prove the clinical benefit of the combined technique, and do not yet justify its use, especially in light of higher cost. Further studies with larger sample size are warranted.
机译:背景:使用氰基丙烯酸酯治疗胃底静脉曲张最令人担心的并发症之一是可能威胁生命的全身性栓塞的发生。因此,内镜医师正在转向包括内窥镜盘绕在内的新技术,作为一种可能更安全,更有效的治疗选择。但是,尚未进行比较这两种技术的研究。目的:本研究旨在比较内镜超声引导线圈和氰基丙烯酸酯注射液与常规注射氰基丙烯酸酯的常规技术的安全性和有效性。设计:中试随机对照试验。方法:随机分为I组的患者采用线圈和氰基丙烯酸酯治疗,II组的患者仅采用氰基丙烯酸酯治疗。在治疗后和初次治疗后一个月,立即评估静脉曲张内的血流。如果确认有血栓形成,则在初次治疗后4个月和10个月进行进一步的随访。手术后所有患者均进行了胸部计算机断层扫描。结果:总共32例患者,每组16例,平均随访9.9个月(1-26个月)。手术后,立即有6名(37.5%)的I组患者和8名(50%)的II组患者在治疗血管中出现了总血流减少(P = 0.476)。 30天后,发现11名(73.3%)I组患者和12名(75%)II组患者有静脉曲张血栓形成。在两组中,大多数患者仅需进行一次静脉曲张闭塞治疗(I组为73.3%,II组为80%)。无症状的肺栓塞发生在I组的4名患者(25%)和II组的8名患者(50%)(P = 0.144)。两组之间未观察到显着差异。结论:内镜超声引导线圈加氰基丙烯酸酯与常规氰基丙烯酸酯技术在栓塞发生率方面无统计学差异。然而,在使用常规技术治疗的组中观察到更大的栓塞倾向。两种技术在消除静脉曲张方面具有相似的功效。鉴于我们的试验数据的样本量很小,我们的结果不足以证明该组合技术的临床益处,并且尚不能证明其合理使用的理由,尤其是鉴于成本较高。有必要对更大的样本量进行进一步的研究。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号