...
首页> 外文期刊>Australasian Journal of Construction Economics and Building >A Refined Basket of Goods Approach for Comparing Construction Costs between Countries
【24h】

A Refined Basket of Goods Approach for Comparing Construction Costs between Countries

机译:精巧的商品篮子方法,用于比较国家之间的建筑成本

获取原文
           

摘要

Most comparisons of construction industry performance requirethat construction costs be converted to a common base. Existingmechanisms for such conversions produce unreliable results.A proposed method for producing industry-specifi c conversionfactors was tested using a single building type. A basket ofmaterials and labour was identifi ed and weighted to refl ect the costshare of each item in a completed project. Prices for the basketwere gathered in three cities and simple construction specifi cconversion indices were calculated based on the constructionpurchasing power of each currency. The construction purchasingpower parities (CPPPs) showed marked differences from otheravailable conversion mechanisms such as exchange rates andgeneral purchasing power parities (PPPs) that have been used inprevious international comparison studies. While the study waslimited in scope, and is only the fi rst stage of a longer process, thesubstantial differences in comparative costs based on purchasingpower illustrate the problems inherent in international costcomparisons. For example, comparing Singapore and Sydney,Singapore costs appear to be only 40% of those in Sydney (basedon exchange rates) about two-thirds the cost of Sydney (usinggeneral PPPs) or almost the same (using the preliminary CPPPs).These results illustrate the problems of converting costs fromlocal currencies to a single base currency and suggest that furtherdevelopment is needed to improve the reliability of outcomes.
机译:建筑行业绩效的大多数比较都要求将建筑成本转换为共同基础。现有的用于这种转换的机制无法获得可靠的结果。使用单个建筑物类型测试了一种提议的用于生产行业特定转换因子的方法。确定了一篮子材料和人工并加权,以反映已完成项目中每个项目的成本分摊。篮子的价格在三个城市中收集,并根据每种货币的建筑购买力计算了简单的建筑规格转换指数。建筑购买力平价(CPPPs)与以前的国际比较研究中使用的其他可用转换机制(例如汇率和一般购买力平价(PPPs))表现出显着差异。虽然研究的范围有限,只是较长过程的第一步,但基于购买力的比较成本的实质差异说明了国际成本比较中固有的问题。例如,与新加坡和悉尼进行比较,新加坡的成本似乎仅是悉尼成本的40%(基于汇率),大约是悉尼成本的三分之二(使用一般PPP)或几乎相同(使用初步CPPP)。说明了将成本从本地货币转换为单一基础货币的问题,并建议需要进一步发展以提高结果的可靠性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号