首页> 外文期刊>Archivio Italiano di Urologia e Andrologia >Lidocaine spray administration in transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy: Five years of experience
【24h】

Lidocaine spray administration in transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy: Five years of experience

机译:经直肠超声引导下前列腺穿刺活检利多卡因喷雾剂:五年经验

获取原文
           

摘要

Objectives: We report in this singlecenter study our results of a five-year experience in the administration of lidocaine spray (LS) during ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy (TPB). Material and Methods: Between August 2008 and July 2013 a total of 1022 consecutive male patients scheduled for TPB with elevate PSA (≥ 4 ng/ml) and (or) abnormal digital rectal and (or) suspect TRUS were considered eligible for the study. Each patient was treated under local anaesthesia with LS (10 gr/100 ml), applied two minutes before the procedure. TPB was performed with the patient in the left lateral decubitus using multi-frequency convex probe “end-fire”. Two experienced urologists performed a 14-core biopsy, as first intention. After the procedure each patient was given a verbal numeric pain scale (VNS). The evaluation was differentiated in two scales VNS: VNS 1 for the insertion of the probe and the manoeuvres associated, while VNS 2 only for the pain during needle’s insertion. Results: Pain scores were not statistically significant different with regard to the values of PSA and prostate gland volume. Pain score levels during probe insertion and biopsy were significantly different: the mean pain score according to VNS was 3.3 (2-8) in the first questionnaire (VNS1) (p < 0.001) and 2.1 (1-7) in the second one (VNS2) (p < 0.125). The 8.2% of cases referred severe or unbearable pain (score ≥ 7), 74% of patients referred no pain at all. Only 21 patients would not ever repeat the biopsy or would request a different type of anaesthesia, while 82% of them would repeat it in the same way. In only eight patients we have not been able to insert TRUS probe. Conclusions: Our pain score data suggest that LS provides efficient patient comfort during TPB reducing pain both during insertion of the probe and the needle. This non-infiltrative anaesthesia is safe, easy to administer, psychologically well accepted by patients and of low cost.
机译:目标:我们在这个单中心研究中报告了我们在超声引导下的前列腺活检(TPB)期间使用利多卡因喷雾剂(LS)的五年经验的结果。材料和方法:在2008年8月至2013年7月之间,总共1022例计划行TPB且PSA升高(≥4 ng / ml)和(或)直肠指异常和(或)可疑TRUS的男性患者被认为符合研究条件。在手术前两分钟,每位患者均接受局部麻醉(10克/ 100毫升LS)进行局部麻醉。使用多频凸探头“ end-fire”对患者左侧卧位进行TPB。两名经验丰富的泌尿科医生首先进行了14芯活检。手术后,给每位患者一个口头数字疼痛量表(VNS)。评估分为两个等级VNS:VNS 1用于探针的插入和相关的操作,而VNS 2仅用于针的插入过程中的疼痛。结果:疼痛评分在PSA和前列腺体积方面无统计学差异。探头插入和活检期间的疼痛评分水平显着不同:第一份问卷(VNS1)中根据VNS的平均疼痛评分为3.3(2-8)(p <0.001),第二份问卷中为2.1(1-7)(VNS1)。 VNS2)(p <0.125)。 8.2%的患者提到严重或难以忍受的疼痛(评分≥7),74%的患者完全没有疼痛。只有21位患者永远不会重复活检或要求不同类型的麻醉,而其中82%的患者会以相同的方式重复进行活检。在只有八名患者中,我们无法插入TRUS探针。结论:我们的疼痛评分数据表明,LS在TPB期间可为患者提供有效的舒适感,从而减轻了在插入探头和针头时的疼痛。这种非渗透性麻醉是安全的,易于实施,在心理上为患者所接受并且成本低廉。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号