...
首页> 外文期刊>Asian Economic and Financial Review >Commercial Bank Non-Interest Fee Charges: Are Fee Charges Different Between Islamic Banks and Conventional Banks? Evidence from Bangladesh
【24h】

Commercial Bank Non-Interest Fee Charges: Are Fee Charges Different Between Islamic Banks and Conventional Banks? Evidence from Bangladesh

机译:商业银行非利息费用:伊斯兰银行和传统银行之间的费用是否有所不同?来自孟加拉国的证据

获取原文
           

摘要

In the Western world, consumers complain about the soaring of non-interest bank fees during the recent years, the post global financial crisis in particular. Commercial banks charge a variety of non-interest fees for their transactions. This paper empirically tests whether the free charges are significantly different between conventional commercial banks and interest free Islamic banks. The average noninterest expenses to assets are 0.017 and 0.011 for conventional banks and Islamic banks respectively. The paper finds, using parametric test and nonparametric tests, no significant differences in noninterest expenses between conventional banks and Islamic banks. The competitive banking market of Bangladesh, suggested by low Herfindahl-Hirschman Index, is an important factor for the equality of mean fee charges between the conventional banks and the Islamic banks.
机译:在西方世界,消费者抱怨近年来非利息银行费用的飙升,尤其是在全球金融危机之后。商业银行会收取各种非利息费用。本文通过经验检验了传统商业银行和无息伊斯兰银行之间的免费费用是否存在显着差异。传统银行和伊斯兰银行的资产平均非利息支出分别为0.017和0.011。本文发现,使用参数检验和非参数检验,传统银行和伊斯兰银行之间的非利息支出没有显着差异。较低的赫芬达尔-赫希曼指数(Herfindahl-Hirschman Index)表明,孟加拉国的竞争性银行市场是传统银行与伊斯兰银行之间平均费用收费相等的重要因素。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号