...
首页> 外文期刊>Archives of Clinical and Experimental Surgery >Early versus delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy with and without percutaneous drainage for complicated acute calculous cholecystitis: A prospective randomized study
【24h】

Early versus delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy with and without percutaneous drainage for complicated acute calculous cholecystitis: A prospective randomized study

机译:早期和延迟腹腔镜胆囊切除术联合或不联合经皮引流治疗复杂性急性结石性胆囊炎:一项前瞻性随机研究

获取原文
           

摘要

Objective: The purpose of this research was to compare surgical consequences of early versus delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy for complicated acute calculous cholecystitis. Patients and Methods: This prospective randomized work was conducted on 150 patients complaining of complicated acute calculous cholecystitis; presented to the Emergency Department, Alexandria Main University Hospital, Egypt, between January 2011 and January 2017. They were distributed randomly into two groups (75 patients each): Group (A) for early laparoscopic cholecystectomy and Group (B) for delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Results: There were 42 men and 108 women. Their mean age at diagnosis was 39.6±10.27 years. The timing of surgery since onset of patients’ complains was ranged from 1.0 to 7.0 days in Group A and from 6 to 10 weeks in Group B. Acute abdominal pain was present in both groups patients. Preoperative CT scan was done for 60 patients (40%) to verify the presence of complications. The mean operative time in Group A and Group B patients were 71.0±26.93 and 38.0±26.25 minutes respectively and there was a statistically significant difference (p0.054). Laparoscopic cholecystectomy was converted to open procedure in ten patients. The mean hospital stay in patients of Group A was 1.76±1.05 while in patients of Group B was 3.87±2.43 in the first admission and 2.72±1.41 in second admission. There was no major bile duct injury or post-operative obstructive jaundice in either group. In six patients (2 in Group A and 4 in Group B) bile leak was noted from the drain and port sites’ infections were found in eight patients. Conclusion: Early laparoscopic cholecystectomy one week from start of symptoms of complicated acute calculous cholecystitis; was safe, feasible, and considered an acceptable indication.
机译:目的:本研究的目的是比较早期和延迟腹腔镜胆囊切除术对复杂急性结石性胆囊炎的手术效果。患者与方法:这项前瞻性随机研究是针对150例并发急性结石性胆囊炎的患者进行的。于2011年1月至2017年1月间被提交给埃及亚历山大中央大学医院急诊室。他们被随机分为两组(每组75例):( A)组用于早期腹腔镜胆囊切除术,(B)组用于延迟腹腔镜胆囊切除术。结果:男42例,女108例。他们的平均诊断年龄为39.6±10.27岁。自患者发作以来的手术时间在A组为1.0到7.0天,B组为6到10周。两组患者均出现急性腹痛。对60例患者(40%)进行了术前CT扫描,以确认是否存在并发症。 A组和B组患者的平均手术时间分别为71.0±26.93分钟和38.0±26.25分钟,差异有统计学意义(p> 0.054)。腹腔镜胆囊切除术转换为开放手术的十例患者。 A组患者首次住院的平均住院天数为1.76±1.05,而B组患者首次住院的平均住院天数为3.87±2.43,第二次住院的平均住院天数为2.72±1.41。两组均无严重胆管损伤或术后梗阻性黄疸。在六名患者中(A组为2例,B组为4例),发现引流管漏出了胆汁,八名患者发现了端口感染。结论:复杂性急性结石性胆囊炎开始出现后一周应进行腹腔镜胆囊切除术。安全,可行并且被认为是可以接受的适应症。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号