首页> 外文期刊>Applied cancer research. >Quality assurance and patient safety protocols for breast and gynecologic pathology in an Academic Women’s Hospital
【24h】

Quality assurance and patient safety protocols for breast and gynecologic pathology in an Academic Women’s Hospital

机译:学术妇女医院乳腺和妇科病理学的质量保证和患者安全规程

获取原文
           

摘要

Background Quality assurance and peer-review practices in surgical pathology have been well described in the literature, but the majority of these reports apply to the realm of general surgical pathology. We focused on the peer-review reporting system of a specialty women’s health pathology practice consisting exclusively of breast and gynecologic pathology, with the specific aims of identifying diagnostic discrepancies that affected patient care. Methods The quality measures in this specialty practice are monitored, and the Medical Director reviews all amended/corrected reports. Error types are qualitative, and are categorized according to impact on patient care. QA data of all amended reports from 2012 to 2014 in breast and gynecologic pathology, as a measure of error type and frequency, were reviewed. Results Of all specimens during this time period, 343 (0.54% of all reports) required amendment due to a QA metric-discovered discrepancy. Breast specimens demonstrated a higher amendment rate than GYN specimens (1.14% of breast specimens versus 0.27% of GYN specimens). The most common error type requiring an amendment for both breast and GYN specimens was a type A, or Minor Disagreement (reports amended for type A discrepancy: 78.7% of total; 81.9% of breast; 72.6% of GYN). Type B, or Moderate Disagreement discrepancies, accounted for 21.3% of all amended cases (reports amended for type B discrepancy: 18.1% of breast; 27.3% of GYN). Of all breast and GYN reports reviewed during the QA evaluation, there were no cases categorized as type C, or Major Disagreements, which would significantly alter patient treatment. Conclusion When surgical pathology is practiced in a laboratory utilizing comprehensive quality assurance protocols, major diagnostic interpretation errors are infrequent. The practice minimizes error, maximizes patient safety, and maximizes educational opportunities of practicing pathologists in real-time.
机译:背景技术在外科病理学中的质量保证和同行评审实践已在文献中得到了很好的描述,但是这些报告中的大多数都适用于一般外科病理学领域。我们专注于特殊女性健康病理学实践的同行评审报告系统,该系统仅由乳房和妇科病理学组成,其特定目的是确定影响患者护理的诊断差异。方法监测该专业实践中的质量措施,并由医务主任审查所有修改/更正的报告。错误类型是定性的,并根据对患者护理的影响进行分类。回顾了2012年至2014年间所有修改过的乳房和妇科病理报告的质量检查数据,以衡量错误类型和发生频率。结果在这段时间内的所有标本中,有343份(占所有报告的0.54%)由于QA指标发现的差异而需要修改。乳腺标本显示出比GYN标本更高的修正率(乳腺标本为1.14%,而GYN标本为0.27%)。需要对乳房和GYN标本进行修改的最常见的错误类型是A型或轻微异议(针对A型差异进行了修订的报告:占总数的78.7%;乳房的81.9%; GYN的72.6%)。 B型或中度差异,占所有修订病例的21.3%(B型差异的修订报告:乳腺18.1%; GYN 27.3%)。在QA评估期间审查的所有乳腺和GYN报告中,没有分类为C型或重大分歧的病例,这会显着改变患者的治疗方式。结论当在实验室中采用综合质量保证规程进行手术病理学检查时,很少有重大的诊断解释错误。这种做法可最大程度地减少错误,最大程度地提高患者安全性,并最大程度地实时提供实践病理学家的培训机会。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号