...
首页> 外文期刊>Agronomy Research >Planting and tending productivity comparison in mounds and disc trenches using containerized and bareroot coniferous seedlings
【24h】

Planting and tending productivity comparison in mounds and disc trenches using containerized and bareroot coniferous seedlings

机译:使用集装箱和裸根针叶树苗在丘陵和圆盘沟中种植和抚育生产力的比较

获取原文
           

摘要

In 2016 more then 40,300 ha of forest was regenerated in Latvia, where 13,000 ha wereseeded or planted and 30,300 ha were left in natural regeneration. Before planting, usually one oftwo soil preparation methods are used – mounding or disc trenching. In areas with optimal waterregime, disc trenching is used, while in wet areas mounding is used. Tree planting and afterplanting tending is done manually by hand tools. The aim of the study was to compare plantingand tending productivity in different soil preparation methods (mounding and disc trenching) byplanting different stocktypes (containerized and bareroot seedlings). Planting time studies weredone in 12 sites and tending time studies in 8 sites. In planting time studies, different plantingoperations were measured and compared. In tending time studies, GPS devices were used, wherearea, distance and working time (productive and rest) was counted from GPS data. Averageplanting time for containerized seedlings in disc trenches was 10.3 seconds, while in mounds 9.2seconds per seedling, an 11% improvement. Average planting time for bareroot seedlings inmounds was 28.3 seconds, while in trenches – 18.2 seconds, a 35% improvement. Tending intrenches was done faster than in mounds. On average, one hectare tending time in mounds was8.4 hours, while in trenches 7.4 hours, an 11% improvement. Walked distance for 1 hectaretending in mounds was 5.4 km, 7% shorter than the distance of 5.0 km in trenches. Factors thatinfluence planting and tending productivity are soil preparation quality, logging residue, andwater level on the site. Data from planting and tending time studies could be used for better planwork activities and select suitable planting material for a particular soil preparation method.
机译:2016年,拉脱维亚再生了40,300公顷的森林,其中种植或种植了13,000公顷,剩下的30,300公顷用于自然再生。种植前,通常使用两种土壤整备方法之一-堆土或盘式挖沟。在水位最佳的地区,使用圆盘挖沟,而在潮湿地区,则使用堆砌。植树和植树后的抚育工作通过手动工具手动完成。这项研究的目的是通过种植不同的种群类型(容器化和裸根幼苗)来比较不同土壤准备方法(堆肥和盘式挖沟)的种植和抚育生产力。在12个地点进行了播种时间研究,在8个地点进行了抚育时间研究。在播种时间研究中,对不同的播种操作进行了测量和比较。在抚育时间研究中,使用了GPS设备,并根据GPS数据计算了区域,距离和工作时间(生产和休息时间)。盘式沟渠中带容器的幼苗的平均播种时间为10.3秒,而每只幼苗的土堆播种时间为9.2秒,提高11%。裸根苗的平均播种时间为28.3秒,而trench沟的平均播种时间为18.2秒,提高了35%。抚育势力比土墩快。平均而言,一公顷的土墩抚育时间为8.4小时,而trench沟的抚育时间为7.4小时,改善了11%。 1英尺高的土墩的步行距离为5.4公里,比沟槽中5.0公里的步行距离短7%。影响种植和养护生产力的因素是整地质量,伐木残渣和现场水位。种植和抚育时间研究的数据可用于更好的计划活动,并为特定的土壤制备方法选择合适的种植材料。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号