...
首页> 外文期刊>Aerosol and Air Quality Research >Size-Resolved Penetration of Filtering Materials from CE-Marked Filtering Facepiece Respirators
【24h】

Size-Resolved Penetration of Filtering Materials from CE-Marked Filtering Facepiece Respirators

机译:具有CE标志的过滤式面罩呼吸器的过滤材料渗透率达到分辨尺寸

获取原文
           

摘要

Throughout the years, the performance of the FFRs has been the topic of extensive studies, resulting mainly in the characterization of aerosol penetration through filters using aerosols that are thought to be similar to those encountered in workplaces. There are limited number of studies in the literature reporting CE-marked respirator performance, and there is a need to perform a penetration evaluation of CE-marked respirators through all 3 filtering classes: FFP1 (80%), FFP2 (94%), and FFP3 (99%). In this study, the percentage penetrations and the most penetrating particle size (MPPS) of 47 mm filters cut out from 13 different CE-marked respirator half masks (2 samples of each FFR) were evaluated size-selectively using nine sizes of charge-neutralized monodisperse aerosol, which ranged from 20 to 400 nm (CMD). Comparison of the penetrations at MPPS from all the examined filters showed that the percentage penetration ranged 3.2–16.3% (FFP1), 2.4–34.3% (FFP2), and 0.02–3.3% (FFP3). Experimental data also revealed that the penetration difference between 2 samples from the same respirator was in most cases up to 6.8%, and between 2 identical respirators up to 2.5%. The MPPS was found to be between 30 and 60 nm (CMD) in all measurements. By comparing the obtained results to the European Standard we conclude that the standard method underestimates particle penetration (especially for particles < 100 nm) due to the usage of non neutralized, polydisperse test aerosol, detection methods burdened with measurement artifacts, and the assumption that the MPPS is at ≈ 600 nm (MMD) as the criterion for filtering facepieces to pass the penetration test.
机译:多年来,FFR的性能一直是广泛研究的主题,主要是通过使用类似于在工作场所中遇到的气溶胶的过滤器来表征气溶胶透过过滤器的渗透特性。文献中报道CE标记的呼吸器性能的研究数量有限,并且需要通过以下三个过滤类别对CE标记的呼吸器进行渗透评估​​:FFP1(80%),FFP2(94%)和FFP3(99%)。在这项研究中,使用9种尺寸的电荷中和剂,选择性地评估了从13种带有CE标记的呼吸器半面罩(每个FFR中有2个样品)切出的47 mm过滤器的渗透百分率和最穿透的粒径(MPPS)。单分散气溶胶,范围从20到400 nm(CMD)。比较所有检查过的过滤器在MPPS处的渗透率,发现渗透率百分比范围分别为3.2-16.3%(FFP1),2.4-34.3%(FFP2)和0.02-3.3%(FFP3)。实验数据还显示,在大多数情况下,来自同一呼吸器的两个样本之间的穿透差异最大为6.8%,而两个相同呼吸器之间的穿透差异最大为2.5%。在所有测量中,发现MPPS在30至60 nm(CMD)之间。通过将获得的结果与欧洲标准进行比较,我们得出以下结论:由于使用了非中和的多分散测试气雾剂,检测方法负担了测量伪像,并且由于假设MPPS在≈600 nm(MMD)处作为过滤面罩以通过渗透测试的标准。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号