...
首页> 外文期刊>Advances in Microbiology >A Single Blind Comparative Randomized Non-Inferior Multicenter Study for Efficacy and Safety of Levofloxacin versus Ciprofloxacin in the Treatment of Uncomplicated Typhoid Fever
【24h】

A Single Blind Comparative Randomized Non-Inferior Multicenter Study for Efficacy and Safety of Levofloxacin versus Ciprofloxacin in the Treatment of Uncomplicated Typhoid Fever

机译:左氧氟沙星与环丙沙星治疗单纯性伤寒的疗效和安全性的单盲比较随机,非劣等多中心研究

获取原文
           

摘要

Ciprofloxacin is currently the drug of choice for typhoid fever, but Salmonella typhi resistance to ciprofloxacin is increasing, while levofloxacin has been shown to be very effective in a few open studies. This study aimed to compare the efficacy, and safety of levofloxacin and ciprofloxacin for typhoid fever. From 110 patients with confirmed typhoid fever, 54 patients received oral levofloxacin 500 mg once daily with one drop out, while 56 received ciprofloxacin 500 mg twice daily for 7 days with two drop outs. Defervescence of fever was achieved on an average of 3 days after initiating levofloxacin and 5 days after starting ciprofloxacin and one microbiologically non confirmed typhoid fever relapse occurred in the levofloxacin group while two relapses with positive Salmonella microorganism occurred in the ciprofloxacin group. No carrier of Salmonella typhi was found in both groups at day 30. Adverse reactions were more pronounced in the ciprofloxacin group compared to the levofloxacin group. In conclusion, oral levofloxacin 500 mg once daily for one week showed faster fever clearance compared to ciprofloxacin 500 mg twice daily in typhoid fever in Indonesia, and less adverse reactions occurred with levofloxacin compared to ciprofloxacin. This electronic document is a “live” template. The various components of your paper (title, text, heads, etc.) are already defined on the style sheet, as illustrated by the portions given in this document.
机译:环丙沙星目前是伤寒的首选药物,但伤寒沙门氏菌对环丙沙星的耐药性正在增加,而左氧氟沙星在一些开放研究中已显示非常有效。本研究旨在比较左氧氟沙星和环丙沙星治疗伤寒的有效性和安全性。在110例确诊为伤寒的患者中,有54例患者每天一次口服500mg左氧氟沙星,有1例退出,而56例患者每天两次,口服环丙沙星500 mg,共7天,有2例退出。左氧氟沙星启动后平均3天和开始使用环丙沙星后5天平均达到退热,在左氧氟沙星组中发生了一种微生物学未证实的伤寒复发,而在环丙沙星组中出现了沙门氏菌阳性的两次复发。两组在第30天均未发现鼠伤寒沙门氏菌的携带者。与左氧氟沙星组相比,环丙沙星组的不良反应更为明显。总之,在印尼伤寒患者中,口服左氧氟沙星500 mg每天一次,持续一周,显示出更快的发烧清除率,与环丙沙星500 mg每天两次相比,与环丙沙星相比,左氧氟沙星发生的不良反应更少。该电子文档是“实时”模板。样式表已经定义了纸张的各种组成部分(标题,文本,标题等),如本文档中给出的部分所示。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号