首页> 外文期刊>Cost Effectiveness Resource Allocation >A cost-utility analysis of pregabalin versus venlafaxine XR in the treatment of generalized anxiety disorder in Portugal
【24h】

A cost-utility analysis of pregabalin versus venlafaxine XR in the treatment of generalized anxiety disorder in Portugal

机译:普瑞巴林与文拉法辛XR在葡萄牙治疗广泛性焦虑症的成本-效用分析

获取原文
           

摘要

Background Generalized anxiety disorder is characterized by excessive anxiety and worry about several events and activities. The estimated 1-year prevalence for adults is around 2% and the lifetime prevalence could reach more than 6%. The disease is associated with reduced quality of life, being comparable to that of major depressive disorder and to chronic illnesses such as diabetes and arthritis, and high consumption of health care resources. Methods A previously published patient-level simulation cost-utility model was adapted to the Portuguese context in order to evaluate clinical and economic consequences of using pregabalin in place of venlafaxine XR in the treatment of generalized anxiety disorder. The model predicts the evolution of 1,000 patients with generalized anxiety disorder, simulating their pathway in weekly cycles over one year treatment. This is done by setting a pre-treatment Hamilton Anxiety Scale score and projecting the weekly impact of the pharmacotherapy on this score. The model uses clinical data from an 8-week flexible dose direct comparison clinical trial between the two drugs; utility values based on a Spanish study; and Portuguese economic data, being the resource consumption obtained via an expert panel. Results Pregabalin patients benefited from 0.738 quality adjusted life years while those on venlafaxine XR achieved 0.712. Moreover, the number of weeks with no or minimal anxiety symptoms was estimated to be 12.9 for pregabalin and only 3.8 for venlafaxine XR. Those clinical gains were achieved at the expense of an extra 715€ per patient, implying an incremental cost per quality adjusted life year of 27,199€ and an incremental cost per week with no or minimal symptoms of 79€. Sensitivity analysis shows that results are robust to main assumptions. Conclusions Assuming a threshold of 30,000€ per quality adjusted life year, pregabalin is cost-effective in comparison with venlafaxine XR in the treatment of generalized anxiety disorder in Portugal.
机译:背景广泛性焦虑症的特征是过度焦虑,并担心一些事件和活动。估计成年人的1年患病率约为2%,终生患病率可能超过6%。该疾病与生活质量下降有关,可与主要的抑郁症和糖尿病,关节炎等慢性病相提并论,并大量消耗卫生保健资源。方法将先前发布的患者水平的模拟成本-效用模型适应葡萄牙的情况,以评估使用普瑞巴林代替文拉法辛XR治疗广泛性焦虑症的临床和经济后果。该模型通过模拟一年治疗中每周周期的途径,预测了1,000名广泛性焦虑症患者的病情发展。这是通过设置治疗前汉密尔顿焦虑量表分数并预测药物治疗对该分数的每周影响来完成的。该模型使用两种药物之间为期8周的灵活剂量直接比较临床试验的临床数据;基于西班牙研究的效用价值;和葡萄牙经济数据,即通过专家小组获得的资源消耗。结果普瑞巴林患者受益于质量调整生命年0.738,而文拉法辛XR患者达到0.712。此外,普瑞巴林估计无症状或无焦虑症状的周数为12.9,文拉法辛XR仅为3.8。这些临床收益是以每位患者额外715欧元为代价的,这意味着每个质量调整生命年的增量成本为27,199欧元,无症状或无症状的每周增量成本为79欧元。敏感性分析表明,结果对主要假设是可靠的。结论假设普瑞巴林的质量调整生命年的门槛为30,000欧元,与文拉法辛XR相比在葡萄牙治疗广泛性焦虑症具有成本效益。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号