首页> 外文期刊>Cost Effectiveness Resource Allocation >The role of discounts and loss leaders in medicine procurement in Austrian hospitals - a primary survey of official and actual medicine prices
【24h】

The role of discounts and loss leaders in medicine procurement in Austrian hospitals - a primary survey of official and actual medicine prices

机译:折扣和亏损领导者在奥地利医院药品采购中的作用-官方和实际药品价格的初步调查

获取原文
           

摘要

Background Knowledge about the prices of medicines used in hospitals, particularly the actually achieved ones, is scant. There are indications of large discounts and the provision of medicines cost-free to Austrian hospitals. The study aims to survey the official and actual prices of medicines procured by Austrian hospitals and to compare them to the out-patient prices. Methods Primary price collection of the official hospital list prices and the actually achieved prices for 12 active ingredients as of the end of September 2009 in five general hospitals in Austria and analysis of the 15 most commonly used presentations. Results The official hospital list prices per unit differed considerably (from 1,500 Euro for an oncology medicine to 0.20 Euro for a generic cardiovascular medicine). For eight on-patent medicines (indications: oncology, anti-inflammatory, neurology-multiple sclerosis and blood) actual hospital medicine prices equaled the list prices (seven medicines) or were lower (one medicine) in four hospitals, whereas one hospital always reported higher actual prices due to the application of a wholesale mark-up. The actual hospital prices of seven medicines (cardiology and immunomodulation) were below the official hospital prices in all hospitals; of these all cardiovascular medicines were provided free-of-charge. Hospital prices were always lower than out-patient prices (pharmacy retail price net and reimbursement price). Conclusion The results suggest little headroom for hospitals to negotiate price reductions for “monopoly products”, i.e. medicines with no therapeutic alternative. Discounts and cost-free provision (loss leaders) appear to be granted for products of strategic importance for suppliers, e.g. cardiovascular medicines, whose treatment tends to be continued in primary care after discharge of the patient.
机译:背景技术关于医院所用药品,尤其是实际取得的药品价格的知识很少。有迹象表明,折扣优惠很大,奥地利医院免费提供药品。该研究旨在调查奥地利医院采购的药品的官方价格和实际价格,并将其与门诊价格进行比较。方法截至2009年9月,奥地利五家综合医院对公立医院的主要价格标价和12种有效成分的实际实现价格进行收集,并对15种最常用的方法进行了分析。结果公立医院每单位的标价差异很大(从抗肿瘤药的1,500欧元到普通心血管药的0.20欧元)。对于八种在用专利药(适应症:肿瘤学,抗炎药,神经病-多发性硬化症和血液),四家医院的实际医院药价等于标价(七种药物)或更低(一种药),而一家医院总是报告由于采用了批发加价,实际价格较高。七种药物(心脏病和免疫调节剂)的实际住院价格均低于所有医院的官方医院价格;所有这些心血管药物均免费提供。医院价格始终低于门诊价格(药品零售价净额和报销价)。结论结果表明,医院商讨“专卖产品”(即无治疗替代品的药品)降价的空间很小。对于供应商具有战略重要性的产品,似乎可以享受折扣和无成本的准备(亏损领先者)。出院后倾向于在初级保健中继续治疗的心血管药物。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号