首页> 外文期刊>Cost Effectiveness Resource Allocation >Hospital costs of central line-associated bloodstream infections and cost-effectiveness of closed vs. open infusion containers. The case of Intensive Care Units in Italy
【24h】

Hospital costs of central line-associated bloodstream infections and cost-effectiveness of closed vs. open infusion containers. The case of Intensive Care Units in Italy

机译:中心线相关的血液感染的医院费用以及封闭式和开放式输液容器的成本效益。意大利的重症监护病房

获取原文
           

摘要

Objectives The aim was to evaluate direct health care costs of central line-associated bloodstream infections (CLABSI) and to calculate the cost-effectiveness ratio of closed fully collapsible plastic intravenous infusion containers vs. open (glass) infusion containers. Methods A two-year, prospective case-control study was undertaken in four intensive care units in an Italian teaching hospital. Patients with CLABSI (cases) and patients without CLABSI (controls) were matched for admission departments, gender, age, and average severity of illness score. Costs were estimated according to micro-costing approach. In the cost effectiveness analysis, the cost component was assessed as the difference between production costs while effectiveness was measured by CLABSI rate (number of CLABSI per 1000 central line days) associated with the two infusion containers. Results A total of 43 cases of CLABSI were compared with 97 matched controls. The mean age of cases and controls was 62.1 and 66.6 years, respectively (p = 0.143); 56% of the cases and 57% of the controls were females (p = 0.922). The mean length of stay of cases and controls was 17.41 and 8.55 days, respectively (p Conclusions CLABSI results in considerable and significant increase in utilization of hospital resources. Use of innovative technologies such as closed infusion containers can significantly reduce the incidence of healthcare acquired infection without posing additional burden on hospital budgets.
机译:目的目的是评估与中心线相关的血液感染(CLABSI)的直接医疗费用,并计算密闭的完全可折叠塑料静脉输液容器与开放式(玻璃)输液容器的成本效益比。方法在意大利一家教学医院的四个重症监护室进行了为期两年的前瞻性病例对照研究。将有CLABSI的患者(病例)和没有CLABSI的患者(对照组)的入院科目,性别,年龄和平均疾病严重程度进行匹配。成本是根据微观成本法估算的。在成本效益分析中,成本成分被评估为生产成本之间的差异,而有效性则通过与两个输液容器相关的CLABSI比率(每1000个中心线天的CLABSI数量)进行衡量。结果将43例CLABSI患者与97例匹配对照者进行比较。病例和对照的平均年龄分别为62.1岁和66.6岁(p = 0.143); 56%的病例和57%的对照是女性(p = 0.922)。病例和对照的平均住院时间分别为17.41天和8.55天(p结论CLABSI显着增加了医院资源的利用率。使用创新技术(例如密闭输液器)可以显着降低卫生保健获得性感染的发生率而不会对医院预算造成额外负担。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号