首页> 外文期刊>Cost Effectiveness Resource Allocation >Prevention, screening and treatment of colorectal cancer: a global and regional generalized cost effectiveness analysis
【24h】

Prevention, screening and treatment of colorectal cancer: a global and regional generalized cost effectiveness analysis

机译:结肠直肠癌的预防,筛查和治疗:全球和区域广义成本效益分析

获取原文
           

摘要

Background Regional generalized cost-effectiveness estimates of prevention, screening and treatment interventions for colorectal cancer are presented. Methods Standardised WHO-CHOICE methodology was used. A colorectal cancer model was employed to provide estimates of screening and treatment effectiveness. Intervention effectiveness was determined via a population state-transition model (PopMod) that simulates the evolution of a sub-regional population accounting for births, deaths and disease epidemiology. Economic costs of procedures and treatment were estimated, including programme overhead and training costs. Results In regions characterised by high income, low mortality and high existing treatment coverage, the addition of screening to the current high treatment levels is very cost-effective, although no particular intervention stands out in cost-effectiveness terms relative to the others. In regions characterised by low income, low mortality with existing treatment coverage around 50%, expanding treatment with or without screening is cost-effective or very cost-effective. Abandoning treatment in favour of screening (no treatment scenario) would not be cost effective. In regions characterised by low income, high mortality and low treatment levels, the most cost-effective intervention is expanding treatment. Conclusions From a cost-effectiveness standpoint, screening programmes should be expanded in developed regions and treatment programmes should be established for colorectal cancer in regions with low treatment coverage.
机译:背景介绍了大肠癌的预防,筛查和治疗干预措施的区域总体成本效益估算。方法采用标准化的WHO-CHOICE方法。使用结肠直肠癌模型来提供筛查和治疗效果的估计。干预效果是通过人口状态转换模型(PopMod)确定的,该模型模拟了考虑到出生,死亡和疾病流行病学的次区域人口的演变。估计了程序和治疗的经济成本,包括程序开销和培训成本。结果在高收入,低死亡率和高现有治疗覆盖率的地区,对目前的高治疗水平进行筛查具有很高的成本效益,尽管在成本效益方面没有其他干预措施相对于其他干预措施更为突出。在收入低,死亡率低且现有治疗覆盖率约为50%的地区,无论是否进行筛查而扩大治疗都是具有成本效益或非常具有成本效益的。放弃治疗而进行筛查(无治疗方案)将不会具有成本效益。在低收入,高死亡率和低治疗水平的地区,最具成本效益的干预措施是扩大治疗。结论从成本效益的角度来看,应该在发达地区扩大筛查计划,并在治疗覆盖率较低的地区建立针对大肠癌的治疗计划。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号