首页> 外文期刊>Acta veterinaria scandinavica >Canine atopic dermatitis: validation of recorded diagnosis against practice records in 335 insured Swedish dogs
【24h】

Canine atopic dermatitis: validation of recorded diagnosis against practice records in 335 insured Swedish dogs

机译:犬特应性皮炎:根据335例受保瑞典犬的操作记录对诊断记录进行验证

获取原文
           

摘要

A cross-sectional study of insured Swedish dogs with a recorded diagnosis of canine atopic dermatitis (CAD) was performed. In order to validate the correctness of this specific diagnosis in the insurance database, medical records were requested by mail from the attending veterinarians. All dogs with a reimbursed claim for the disease during 2002 were included in the original study sample (n = 373). Medical records were available for 335 individuals (response rate: 89.8%). By scrutinizing the submitted records it was determined that all dogs had been treated for dermatologic disease, and that 327 (97.6%) could be considered to have some allergic skin disease. However, as information regarding dietary trial testing was missing in many dogs the number that were truly atopic could not be determined. The clinical presentation and nature of test diet for dogs with or without response to dietary trial testing was compared for a subset of 109 individuals that had undergone such testing. The only significant difference between these two groups was that the proportion of dogs with reported gastrointestinal signs was higher in the group that subsequently responded to a diet trial. In conclusion, the agreement between the recorded diagnosis in the insurance database and the clinical manifestations recorded in the submitted medical records was considered acceptable. The concern was raised that many attending veterinarians did not exclude cutaneous adverse food reactions before making the diagnosis of CAD.
机译:对有保险的瑞典犬进行横断面研究,并记录诊断为犬特应性皮炎(CAD)。为了在保险数据库中验证此特定诊断的正确性,要求主治兽医通过邮件要求提供医疗记录。原始研究样本(n = 373)中包括了所有在2002年对该疾病有偿还的狗。有335人的病历(回复率:89.8%)。通过仔细检查提交的记录,可以确定所有狗都已接受过皮肤病治疗,可以认为其中327例(97.6%)患有某种过敏性皮肤病。但是,由于许多狗都缺少有关饮食试验的信息,因此无法确定真正的特应性数字。比较了接受或不接受饮食试验测试的狗的临床表现和试验饮食的性质,对经过这种测试的109个人进行了比较。两组之间唯一的显着差异是,在随后对饮食试验做出反应的组中,具有胃肠道症状的犬比例更高。总之,保险数据库中记录的诊断与提交的病历中记录的临床表现之间的一致性被认为是可以接受的。引起关注的是,许多主治兽医在做出CAD诊断之前并未排除皮肤不良食物反应。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号