首页> 外文期刊>Current Journal of Applied Science and Technology >Qualimetric Assessment of Students’ ResearchCompetence within the Context of EducationInformatization
【24h】

Qualimetric Assessment of Students’ ResearchCompetence within the Context of EducationInformatization

机译:教育信息化背景下对学生研究能力的量化评估

获取原文
           

摘要

Aims: Is building a model for assessing students’ research competence.Study Design: Experimental testing of the assessment model for students’ research competence.Place and Duration of Study: Students (n=648, 2009, 2010 и 2011 enrolment years) at technical university – Kuban State Technological University.Methodology: Used methods: Systemic approach, qualimetric approach, competence approach (targets students at effective use of the obtained knowledge and skills, to settle successfully living, social and professional tasks), metasystemic approach ( a portfolio is viewed as apically implicit system comprising relatively autonomous components), synergetic approach (development of students’ research competence is viewed in integral relation with their professional self-organization and self-development) and student-centered approach (a learner’s priority is manifested in educational process).Results: Decision rules (AI term) for integrated assessment of research competence are as follows:1. If cognitive, operational, motivational and behavior components are registered high, and reflexive component is medium and up, in this case, the level is marked as creative.2. If at least one component (except reflexive) is registered very low, the level is marked as immature.3. If motivational component is registered low, and cognitive, operational or behavior ones are in between low and medium, the level is marked as situational.4. If all components are registered medium (reflexive can go low), the level of competence is marked as literate.5. If two or three components are registered high, the rest are medium and up, the level is marked as scholarly.Conclusion: The suggested criteria and levels represent an integral component of criteria and assessment framework for psychological and pedagogical monitoring (monitoring of personal and professional development of students) and a basis for forecasting personal and professional growth of students. With informatization of professional education it is possible to assess students’ research competence on the basis of keeping a portfolio.
机译:目标:正在建立评估学生研究能力的模型研究设计:对学生研究能力评估模型的实验测试研究的地点和持续时间:技术专业的学生(n = 648,2009,2010и2011入学年)大学–库班州立技术大学。方法:使用的方法:系统方法,定性方法,能力方法(针对有效利用所获得的知识和技能的学生,以成功解决生活,社会和职业任务为目标),元系统方法(投资组合为被视为由相对自治的组件构成的隐性系统),协同方法(将学生研究能力的发展与他们的专业自我组织和自我发展紧密联系在一起)和以学生为中心的方法(在学习过程中表现出学习者的优先权) )。结果:用于综合评估研究能力的决策规则(AI术语)如下: 1。如果认知,操作,动机和行为成分注册得较高,而反身成分则处于中等或更高水平,在这种情况下,该级别被标记为创造性。2。如果至少有一种成分(反射性成分除外)的含量极低,则该级别标记为未成熟3。如果动机成分偏低,认知,操作或行为成分偏低或偏中,则将其标记为情境。4。如果所有成分都注册为中等(反身会变低),则能力水平标记为识字5。如果两个或三个组成部分的注册水平较高,其余部分为中等或更高级别,则该级别被标记为学术水平。结论:建议的标准和级别代表了心理和教学监测(个人和专业监测的标准和评估框架)的组成部分学生的成长)和预测学生个人和专业成长的基础。通过专业教育的信息化,可以在保持档案袋的基础上评估学生的研究能力。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号