...
首页> 外文期刊>Comparative Economic Research >Catching Up And Falling Behind: Four Puzzles After Two Decades Of Post-Communist Transformation / Doganianie Czy Pozostawanie w Tyle: Cztery Zagadki Po Dwóch Dekadach Transformacji Postkomunistycznej
【24h】

Catching Up And Falling Behind: Four Puzzles After Two Decades Of Post-Communist Transformation / Doganianie Czy Pozostawanie w Tyle: Cztery Zagadki Po Dwóch Dekadach Transformacji Postkomunistycznej

机译:追赶和落后:共产主义后的两个十年转型后的四个谜题/追赶和落后:共产主义后的两个十年转型后的四个谜题/

获取原文
           

摘要

After more than two decades since the exit from Communism, no former communist country has been completely successful in catching up with the technological frontier countries. However, they divide into two groups: those which decreased the GDP gap with frontier countries since 1989-1990, and those which failed to do so. One may ask: What were the decisive causal conditions for their progress or failure in convergence? Were they the early implementation of Washington consensus style market reforms; their neighbourhood with advanced affluent countries; peaceful transition; accession to the EU; endowment with natural resources; state sovereignty before postcommunism; or interactions between these factors (or others)? Because of the small N, statistical analysis is not an appropriate tool for testing these hypotheses. Hence this paper uses qualitative comparative analysis to identify four explanatory puzzles of the catching-up growth performance of the postcommunist countries.
机译:从共产主义国家退出后的二十多年中,没有一个前共产主义国家完全成功地赶上了技术前沿国家。但是,它们分为两类:一类是自1989-1990年以来与边境国家的GDP差距缩小的群体,另一类是没有这样做的群体。有人可能会问:其进展或融合失败的决定性因果条件是什么?他们是否早日实施了华盛顿共识式的市场改革;与发达富裕国家的邻里;和平过渡;加入欧盟;拥有自然资源的;赋;后共产主义之前的国家主权;或这些因素(或其他因素)之间的相互作用?由于N较小,因此统计分析不是检验这些假设的合适工具。因此,本文使用定性比较分析来确定对后共产主义国家追赶性增长表现的四个解释难题。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号