首页> 外文期刊>College & Research Libraries >Cost Differentials between E-Books and Print in Academic Libraries
【24h】

Cost Differentials between E-Books and Print in Academic Libraries

机译:高校图书馆电子书和印刷品的成本差异

获取原文
           

摘要

Academic libraries continue to face funding pressures compounded by the need to provide students with access to electronic resources, both in journal and book formats. With space constraints and the need to repurpose library space to other uses, libraries must carefully examine the move to e-only formats for books to determine if the format makes reasonable economic sense. A survey conducted at Auburn University at Montgomery (AUM) has confirmed for academic libraries the work of Gray and Copeland on e-books being more expensive than print for public libraries. For AUM, the mean cost for an e-book is significantly higher than for the print counterpart of that title. The cost differentials between the two formats show e-books as being consistently higher than print in initial price. This consistency holds true across all LC classifications, regardless of whether or not the title is published by a university press or a commercial press.
机译:高校图书馆继续面临资金压力,需要为学生提供期刊和书籍形式的电子资源,这使情况更加复杂。由于篇幅所限,并且需要将图书馆的空间重新分配给其他用途,因此图书馆必须仔细检查向书籍的仅电子格式的转移,以确定该格式是否具有合理的经济意义。蒙哥马利奥本大学(AUM)进行的一项调查已经证实,对于大学图书馆来说,格雷和库普兰在电子书上的工作要比公共图书馆的印刷书贵。对于AUM,电子书的平均成本明显高于该书的印刷版。两种格式之间的成本差异表明,电子书的初始价格始终高于印刷本。这种一致性在所有LC分类中均适用,无论标题是由大学出版社还是商业出版社出版。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号