首页> 外文期刊>Biology of Mood & Anxiety Disorders >Criteria of validity for animal models of psychiatric disorders: focus on anxiety disorders and depression
【24h】

Criteria of validity for animal models of psychiatric disorders: focus on anxiety disorders and depression

机译:精神疾病动物模型的有效性标准:关注焦虑症和抑郁症

获取原文
           

摘要

Animal models of psychiatric disorders are usually discussed with regard to three criteria first elaborated by Willner; face, predictive and construct validity. Here, we draw the history of these concepts and then try to redraw and refine these criteria, using the framework of the diathesis model of depression that has been proposed by several authors. We thus propose a set of five major criteria (with sub-categories for some of them); homological validity (including species validity and strain validity), pathogenic validity (including ontopathogenic validity and triggering validity), mechanistic validity, face validity (including ethological and biomarker validity) and predictive validity (including induction and remission validity). Homological validity requires that an adequate species and strain be chosen: considering species validity, primates will be considered to have a higher score than drosophila, and considering strains, a high stress reactivity in a strain scores higher than a low stress reactivity in another strain. Pathological validity corresponds to the fact that, in order to shape pathological characteristics, the organism has been manipulated both during the developmental period (for example, maternal separation: ontopathogenic validity) and during adulthood (for example, stress: triggering validity). Mechanistic validity corresponds to the fact that the cognitive (for example, cognitive bias) or biological mechanisms (such as dysfunction of the hormonal stress axis regulation) underlying the disorder are identical in both humans and animals. Face validity corresponds to the observable behavioral (ethological validity) or biological (biomarker validity) outcomes: for example anhedonic behavior (ethological validity) or elevated corticosterone (biomarker validity). Finally, predictive validity corresponds to the identity of the relationship between the triggering factor and the outcome (induction validity) and between the effects of the treatments on the two organisms (remission validity). The relevance of this framework is then discussed regarding various animal models of depression.
机译:精神疾病的动物模型通常是根据Willner首先提出的三个标准进行讨论的。面对,预测和建构效度。在这里,我们回顾了这些概念的历史,然后尝试使用由多位作者提出的抑郁症的素质模型框架重新绘制和完善这些标准。因此,我们提出了一组五个主要标准(其中一些包含子类别);同源性有效性(包括物种有效性和品系有效性),致病性有效性(包括致病性有效性和触发性有效性),机制有效性,面部有效性(包括行为学和生物标志物有效性)以及预测性有效性(包括诱导和缓解有效性)。同源性的有效性要求选择适当的物种和品系:考虑到物种的有效性,灵长类动物将被认为比果蝇具有更高的分数,并且考虑到品系,该品系中的高胁迫反应性得分高于另一品系中的低胁迫反应性。病理有效性对应于以下事实:为了塑造病理特征,在发育阶段(例如,母体分离:致病有效性)和成年期(例如,压力:触发有效性)都对有机体进行了操纵。机械有效性对应于以下事实:在人类和动物中,该病症的认知(例如认知偏向)或生物学机制(例如荷尔蒙应力轴调节功能障碍)是相同的。面部有效性与可观察到的行为(伦理学有效性)或生物学(生物标志物有效性)结果相对应:例如,无性行为(伦理学有效性)或皮质酮升高(生物标志物有效性)。最后,预测效度对应于触发因素与结果之间的关系(诱导效度)以及治疗对两种生物的影响(缓解效度)之间的关系。然后讨论关于各种抑郁症动物模型的该框架的相关性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号