...
首页> 外文期刊>Cogent Social Sciences >Critical terrorism studies (CTS): (State) (sponsored) terrorism identified in the (militarized) pedagogy of (U.S.) law enforcement agencies
【24h】

Critical terrorism studies (CTS): (State) (sponsored) terrorism identified in the (militarized) pedagogy of (U.S.) law enforcement agencies

机译:关键恐怖主义研究(CTS):在(美国)执法机构的(军事化)教学法中确定的(州)(赞助)恐怖主义

获取原文
           

摘要

For over a decade, scholars of Critical Terrorism Studies (CTS) – a subset of terrorism studies identifying with the widening and deepening era of International Relations (IR) – have persuaded scholars of political sociology to push the disciplinary boundaries imposed by Orthodox Terrorism Studies (OTS). OTS academics reify a positivist conceptualization of terrorism that is exclusively theorized using an institutionalized problem-solving approach that wholly perceives perpetrators of terrorism as being non-state actors and (almost) never Northern democratic sovereign state actors. Adopting a critical and reflexive lens to the study of terrorism allows us to highlight the danger of ignoring the increased sanctioning of state sponsored terrorism identified in the militarization of law enforcement agencies after the events of 9/11. The militarized and terroristic pedagogy adopted by law enforcement and other representatives to secure the homeland is noticed in law enforcement agencies re-writing the social contract by presuming civilians as threats to national security thus ejecting them from the body politic. The paper concludes by proposing that we identify university institutions as educational spaces that provide an opportune site to develop an oppositional critical pedagogy (OCP) ushering a demilitarized culture and social emancipation. The development of an OCP to militarization works in tandem with CTS contesting and immanently critiquing societal militarization by opposing educational spaces becoming sites that (re)produce and sanctify terroristic/warfare state actions which impede on the rights of citizens enshrined in the democratic experience of modern northern liberal states.
机译:十多年来,批判恐怖主义研究(CTS)的学者(说服国际关系(IR)不断扩大和加深时代的恐怖主义研究的一个子集)说服政治社会学学者推动东正教恐怖主义研究施加的学科界限( OTS)。 OTS的学者们对恐怖主义的实证主义概念进行了验证,这种概念化完全是通过使用制度化的问题解决方法来理论化的,该方法完全将恐怖主义的肇事者视为非国家行为者,并且(几乎)从未将其视为北方民主主权国家行为者。对恐怖主义的研究采用批判性和反思性的视角,使我们能够强调忽视9/11事件后在执法机构军事化中发现的国家资助的恐怖主义越来越多的制裁的危险。执法机构和其他代表为确保家园安全而采取的军事化和恐怖主义教学法在执法机构中得到了重新发现,因为他们将平民推定为对国家安全的威胁,从而将他们从政体中驱逐出去,从而重写了社会契约。本文最后提出建议,我们将大学机构确定为教育空间,为发展具有非军事文化和社会解放的对立批判教育学(OCP)提供机会。发展OCP进行军事化的工作与CTS竞争并通过反对教育空间成为社会性场所,从而使(重新)生产和使恐怖主义/战争国家行动成为神圣的场所,从而阻碍了社会军事化,而恐怖主义/战争国家行动阻碍了体现在现代民主经验中的公民的权利北部自由主义国家。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号