...
首页> 外文期刊>Clinical practice and epidemiology in mental health >Active Aging and Elderly’s Quality of Life: Comparing the Impact on Literature of Projects Funded by the European Union and USA
【24h】

Active Aging and Elderly’s Quality of Life: Comparing the Impact on Literature of Projects Funded by the European Union and USA

机译:积极的老龄化和老年人的生活质量:比较欧盟和美国资助的项目对文学的影响

获取原文
           

摘要

Background: The objective of this research is to verify whether European projects on Active Aging (AA) and Elderly Quality of Life (Qol) funded by the Seventh Framework Programme (FP7) produce an impact on literature similar to projects funded by the National Health Institute (NHI) of the United States on international literature using well-known bibliometric indicators. This effort may be useful in developing standardized and replicable procedures. Methods: Fifteen randomly selected projects on AA and Elderly Qol concluded in August 2017 and funded by FP7 were compared to similar projects funded by the US NHI with reference to papers published (Scopus and Scholar), papers published in Q1 journals, and the number of citations of the papers linked to the projects. Results: In all the indicators considered, the European projects showed no difference with the US NHI projects. Conclusions: The EU-funded AA and Qol Elderly projects have an impact on scientific literature comparable to projects funded in the United States by the NHI Agency. Our results are consistent with the data on general medical research, which indicates that, European research remains at a high level of competitiveness. In this experimental study, our methodology appeared to be convincing and reliable and it could be applied to the extent of the impact of more extensive research areas. Our research did not evaluate the relationship between funding required by research and scientific productivity.
机译:背景:本研究的目的是验证由第七框架计划(FP7)资助的欧洲有关主动衰老(AA)和老年人生活质量(Qol)的项目是否对文献产生影响,类似于由国家卫生研究院资助的项目(NHI)在国际文献中使用著名的文献计量指标。这项工作可能对开发标准化和可复制的程序很有用。方法:参照2017年8月在AA7和Qol老年Qol上随机抽取的15个项目(由FP7资助)与美国NHI资助的类似项目进行比较,参考已发表的论文(Scopus和Scholar),在Q1期刊上发表的论文以及与项目相关的论文的引文。结果:在考虑的所有指标中,欧洲项目与美国NHI项目没有差异。结论:与NHI机构在美国资助的项目相比,由欧盟资助的AA和Qol老年人项目对科学文献产生了影响。我们的结果与一般医学研究的数据一致,这表明欧洲研究仍处于较高的竞争力水平。在本实验研究中,我们的方法论似乎是令人信服和可靠的,可以应用于更广泛的研究领域的影响。我们的研究未评估研究所需资金与科学生产力之间的关系。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号