...
首页> 外文期刊>Cogent Psychology >Moral antecedents of authentic leadership: Do moral justice reasoning, self-importance of moral identity and psychological hardiness stimulate authentic leadership?
【24h】

Moral antecedents of authentic leadership: Do moral justice reasoning, self-importance of moral identity and psychological hardiness stimulate authentic leadership?

机译:真正领导的道德前提:道德正义推理,道德认同的自我重要性和心理耐力会刺激真正的领导吗?

获取原文
           

摘要

The aim of the present study is to explore intra-psychological moral processes as potential antecedents of authentic leadership (AL) behavior, and as such add to the scarce knowledge about underlying moral processes involved in the execution of such leadership. In a sample of Norwegian naval officer cadets (N ?=?139), mature principled moral reasoning, self-importance of moral identity (i.e. importance of being a moral person) and mental resilience in terms of hardiness are used as predictor variables, and peer ratings of AL was outcome measure. A step-wise hierarchical regression analysis showed that mature moral reasoning and internalized moral identity explained 17% of the variance in AL at composite level. At dimension-levels of AL, models explaining 15% of the variation in “transparency” (i.e. open about thoughts and feelings) and 16% of “internalized moral perspective” (i.e. moral integrity) emerged, with mature moral reasoning, internalized—and symbolized moral identity as significant predictors. For the AL dimensions “balanced processing” (i.e. activating critical voices) and “self-awareness”, 8 and 10% of variance was explained, respectively, with mature moral reasoning and internalized moral identity as only significant predictors. Unexpectedly, psychological hardiness was unrelated to all dimensions of AL. Thus, the study suggests that mature moral reasoning and moral motivation represent important aims for leader development among emergency leaders, and as criteria for leader selection. It also suggests that AL encompasses a genuine morals orientation, conversely to a manipulative approach.
机译:本研究的目的是探索内部心理道德过程,作为真实领导(AL)行为的潜在先决条件,从而增加对执行这种领导所涉及的潜在道德过程的认识。在挪威海军军官学员的样本中(N = 139),将成熟的有原则的道德推理,道德身份的自我重要性(即成为道德人的重要性)和在韧性方面的心理弹性用作预测指标。变量,而AL的同级评估是结果的衡量标准。逐步分层回归分析表明,成熟的道德推理和内在的道德认同在综合水平上解释了AL差异的17%。在AL的维度级别上,出现了解释“透明度”变化的15%(即思想和感情开放)和“内在道德观点”(即道德完整性)的16%的模型,这些模型具有成熟的道德推理,内在化和内在化。将道德身份象征为重要的预测因素。对于AL维度,“平衡处理”(即激活批判声音)和“自我意识”分别解释了8%和10%的方差,其中成熟的道德推理和内在的道德认同只是重要的预测因素。出乎意料的是,心理耐力与AL的各个方面都没有关系。因此,该研究表明,成熟的道德推理和道德动机是应急领导者中领导者发展的重要目标,并且是领导者选择的标准。这也表明,AL包含了真正的道德取向,与操纵方法相反。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号