首页> 外文期刊>Clinical Psychopharmacology and Neuroscience >Korean Medication Algorithm for Bipolar Disorder 2018: Comparisons with Other Treatment Guidelines
【24h】

Korean Medication Algorithm for Bipolar Disorder 2018: Comparisons with Other Treatment Guidelines

机译:韩国双相情感障碍用药算法2018:与其他治疗指南的比较

获取原文
           

摘要

The objective of this study was to compare recommendations of the Korean Medication Algorithm Project for Bipolar Disorder 2018 (KMAP-BP 2018) with other recently published guidelines for treating bipolar disorder. We reviewed a total of five recently published global treatment guidelines and compared treatment recommendation of the KMAP-BP 2018 with those of other guidelines. For initial treatment of mania, there were no significant differences across treatment guidelines. All guidelines recommended mood stabilizer (MS) or atypical antipsychotic (AAP) monotherapy or a combination of an MS with an AAP as a first-line treatment strategy for mania. However, the KMAP-BP 2018 did not prefer monotherapy with MS or AAP for psychotic mania. Quetiapine, olanzapine and aripiprazole were the first-line AAPs for nearly all phases of bipolar disorder across guidelines. Most guidelines advocated newer AAPs as first-line treatment options for all phases while lamotrigine was recommended for depressive and maintenance phases. Lithium and valproic acid were commonly used as MSs in all phases of bipolar disorder. As research evidence accumulated over time, recommendations of newer AAPs (such as asenapine, cariprazine, paliperidone, lurasidine, long-acting injectable risperidone and aripiprazole once monthly) became prominent. KMAP-BP 2018 guidelines were similar to other guidelines, reflecting current changes in prescription patterns for bipolar disorder based on accumulated research data. Strong preference for combination therapy was characteristic of KMAP-BP 2018, predominantly in the treatment of psychotic mania and severe depression. Further studies were needed to address several issues identified in our review.
机译:这项研究的目的是将2018年《韩国躁郁症药物治疗算法项目》(KMAP-BP 2018)的建议与其他最近发表的治疗躁郁症的指南进行比较。我们审查了总共五份最近发布的全球治疗指南,并将KMAP-BP 2018的治疗建议与其他指南进行了比较。对于躁狂症的初始治疗,各治疗指南之间无显着差异。所有指南均建议使用情绪稳定剂(MS)或非典型抗精神病药物(AAP)单一疗法或将MS与AAP结合作为躁狂症的一线治疗策略。但是,KMAP-BP 2018对于精神病性躁狂症不希望采用MS或AAP单一疗法。在指南中,喹硫平,奥氮平和阿立哌唑几乎是双相情感障碍所有阶段的一线AAP。大多数指南主张将更新的AAP作为所有阶段的一线治疗选择,而拉莫三嗪则被推荐用于抑郁和维持阶段。在双相情感障碍的所有阶段,锂和丙戊酸通常用作MS。随着研究证据的不断积累,对新型AAP(例如阿塞那平,卡立哌嗪,帕潘立酮,卢拉西丁,长效可注射利培酮和阿立哌唑的推荐)每月一次。 KMAP-BP 2018指南与其他指南相似,根据累积的研究数据反映出躁郁症处方模式的当前变化。 KMAP-BP 2018的主要特点是对联合疗法的强烈偏爱,主要用于治疗精神病性躁狂症和严重抑郁症。需要进一步的研究来解决我们的审查中确定的几个问题。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号