...
首页> 外文期刊>Clinical epigenetics. >Comparison of pre-processing methodologies for Illumina 450k methylation array data in familial analyses
【24h】

Comparison of pre-processing methodologies for Illumina 450k methylation array data in familial analyses

机译:家族分析中Illumina 450k甲基化阵列数据预处理方法的比较

获取原文
           

摘要

BackgroundHuman methylome mapping in health and disease states has largely relied on Illumina Human Methylation 450k array (450k array) technology. Accompanying this has been the necessary evolution of analysis pipelines to facilitate data processing. The majority of these pipelines, however, cater for experimental designs where matched ‘controls’ or ‘normal’ samples are available. Experimental designs where no appropriate ‘reference’ exists remain challenging. Herein, we use data generated from our study of the inheritance of methylome profiles in families to evaluate the performance of eight normalisation pre-processing methods. Fifty individual samples representing four families were interrogated on five 450k array BeadChips. Eight normalisation methods were tested using qualitative and quantitative metrics, to assess efficacy and suitability. ResultsStratified quantile normalisation combined with ComBat were consistently found to be the most appropriate when assessed using density, MDS and cluster plots. This was supported quantitatively by ANOVA on the first principal component where the effect of batch dropped from p ConclusionsA strategy combining stratified QN with ComBat is appropriate for use in the analyses when no reference sample is available but preservation of biological variation is paramount. There is great potential for use of 450k array data to further our understanding of the methylome in a variety of similar settings. Such advances will be reliant on the determination of appropriate methodologies for processing these data such as established here.
机译:背景技术在健康和疾病状态下的人类甲基化基因组图谱很大程度上依赖于Illumina人类甲基化450k阵列(450k阵列)技术。随之而来的是分析管道的必要演变,以促进数据处理。但是,这些管道中的大多数都适合实验设计,在这些设计中可以使用匹配的“对照”或“正常”样品。没有合适的“参考”存在的实验设计仍然具有挑战性。在这里,我们使用从对家族中甲基化基因组谱的遗传研究中获得的数据来评估八种标准化预处理方法的性能。在五个450k阵列的BeadChips上询问了代表四个家庭的五十个个体样本。使用定性和定量指标测试了八种归一化方法,以评估功效和适用性。结果在使用密度,MDS和聚类图进行评估时,始终发现结合ComBat进行分层分位数归一化是最合适的。方差分析在第一个主要成分上的定量支持了这一点,其中批次的影响从p下降。结论没有参考样品但保留生物学变异至关重要时,将分层QN与ComBat结合的策略适用于分析。在各种相似的环境中,使用450k阵列数据有很大的潜力来加深我们对甲基化组的了解。这样的进展将取决于确定适当的方法来处理这些数据,例如此处确定的方法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号