首页> 外文期刊>Clinical Nursing Studies >Influence of clinical practice guidelines on pain management in german intensive care units – A state wide survey
【24h】

Influence of clinical practice guidelines on pain management in german intensive care units – A state wide survey

机译:临床实践指南对德国重症监护病房疼痛管理的影响-一项全国性调查

获取原文
           

摘要

Systematic pain assessment in critically ill patients might reduce the number of days with mechanical ventilation as well as the length of hospital stay. Clinical practice guidelines recommend the use of standardized instruments as part of a structured pain assessment strategy for mechanically ventilated patients in intensive care units. Since it is unknown whether clinicians adhere to the recommendations, we conducted a survey focusing the main recommendation of pain and sedation assessment for critically ill patients with mechanical ventilation. A questionnaire consisting of eight items was developed, piloted and sent out to 457 intensive care units in North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany. Nursing directors were asked to forward the questionnaire to the ward nurses or the physicians in charge of the intensive care units. The response rate was 37.4% (n=171). Nurses from 68 out of 171 intensive care units indicated the use of a pain assessment tool; identified as n=39 used self-reporting tools or n=29 proxy rating tools; n=88 answered to use sedation assessment tools. A total of 801 physiological parameters for pain assessment were stated, most often blood pressure (19.5%), heart rate (18.6%), body language (16.7%), and respiratory rate (16.0%). Although recommended in the guidelines, our survey indicates that pain assessment tools are rarely used at German intensive care units. It remains unclear how nurses and physicians use pain assessment tools in combination with other parameters for systematic pain assessment. Further research is needed on the barriers of guideline implementation to intensive care units.
机译:重症患者的系统性疼痛评估可能会减少机械通气的天数以及住院时间。临床实践指南建议使用重症监护室中机械通气患者的标准化仪器作为结构化疼痛评估策略的一部分。由于尚不清楚临床医生是否遵守这些建议,我们进行了一项调查,重点针对机械通气危重患者的疼痛和镇静评估的主要建议。一份由八项组成的问卷被开发,试行并发送到德国北莱茵-威斯特法伦州的457重症监护病房。要求护理总监将问卷转发给负责重症监护病房的病房护士或医生。回应率为37.4%(n = 171)。 171个重症监护病房中有68个的护士表示使用了疼痛评估工具。被确定为n = 39个使用过的自我报告工具或n = 29个代理评级工具; n = 88,回答使用镇静评估工具。陈述了用于疼痛评估的总共801个生理参数,最常见的是血压(19.5%),心率(18.6%),肢体语言(16.7%)和呼吸频率(16.0%)。尽管在指南中有建议,但我们的调查表明,疼痛评估工具很少在德国重症监护病房使用。尚不清楚护士和医生如何结合其他参数使用疼痛评估工具进行系统性疼痛评估。需要对重症监护病房实施指南的障碍进行进一步研究。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号