首页> 外文期刊>Clinical ophthalmology >Femtosecond laser versus mechanical microkeratome-assisted flap creation for LASIK: a prospective, randomized, paired-eye study
【24h】

Femtosecond laser versus mechanical microkeratome-assisted flap creation for LASIK: a prospective, randomized, paired-eye study

机译:飞秒激光与机械微角膜刀辅助皮瓣创制LASIK:前瞻性,随机,双眼研究

获取原文
           

摘要

Purpose: To compare a femtosecond laser with a microkeratome for flap creation during laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) in terms of flap thickness predictability and visual outcomes.Patients and methods: This was a prospective, randomized, masked, paired-eye study. Forty-four patients (34?females) who received bilateral LASIK were included. Patients were stratified by ocular dominance, and they then underwent randomization of flap creation using the femtosecond laser on one eye and undergoing the microkeratome procedure on the other one. The visual outcome differences between the corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA) at baseline and the uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA) on the first day postoperatively were set as the efficiency index for both groups. All visual acuity outcome results and the deviation of flap thickness were evaluated. P-values <0.05?were considered statistically significant.Results: The index of efficiency regarding the postoperative visual outcomes in the microkeratome group was lower (P<0.0001). This result was correlated with the difference between intended and achieved flap thickness (P=0.038; r=0.28), and a negative relationship in the regression analysis was confirmed (P<0.04; R2=0.1428). The UDVA in the microkeratome group improved significantly by the end of the first month (P<0.0271) in comparison to the baseline CDVA. The deviation between intended and postoperative flap thickness using either optical coherence pachymetry or Heidelberg Retinal Tomography II confocal microscopy was statistically significant (paired t-test; P<0.001) between the groups. The flap thickness deviation in the microkeratome group was higher. In the femtosecond laser group, the efficiency index was stable postoperatively (P=0.64) The UDVA improved significantly by the end of the first postoperative week (P=0.0043) in comparison to the baseline CDVA. Six months after surgery, improvement in the UDVA was significant in both groups (all P<0.001; one way analysis of variance).Conclusion: Femtosecond laser was superior to microkeratome-assisted LASIK in terms of flap thickness predictability and the speed of visual acuity recovery. A negative relationship in the regression analysis between increasing flap thickness deviation and visual acuity recovery was confirmed.
机译:目的:比较飞秒激光与微型角膜刀在激光原位角膜磨镶术(LASIK)期间皮瓣厚度可预测性和视觉效果方面的皮瓣形成。患者和方法:这是一项前瞻性,随机,蒙面,双眼研究。包括接受双侧LASIK手术的44例患者(34例女性)。根据眼部优势对患者进行分层,然后使用飞秒激光对一只眼睛进行皮瓣制作随机化,对另一只眼睛进行微角膜刀手术。将两组术后第一天的基线矫正远视力(CDVA)和未矫正远视力(UDVA)之间的视觉结果差异作为效率指标。评价所有视力结果结果和皮瓣厚度偏差。 P值<0.05被认为具有统计学意义。结果:微角膜刀组术后视觉效果的效率指数较低(P <0.0001)。该结果与预期的皮瓣厚度和达到的皮瓣厚度之间的差异相关(P = 0.038; r = 0.28),并且在回归分析中证实了负相关关系(P <0.04; R2 = 0.1428)。与基线CDVA相比,微型角膜刀组中的UDVA在第一个月末显着改善(P <0.0271)。两组之间使用光学相干测厚法或海德堡视网膜断层扫描II共聚焦显微镜观察的预期皮瓣厚度与术后皮瓣厚度之间的差异具有统计学意义(配对t检验; P <0.001)。微型角膜刀组的皮瓣厚度偏差较高。在飞秒激光组中,术后效率指数稳定(P = 0.64)。与基线CDVA相比,术后第一周结束时UDVA显着改善(P = 0.0043)。术后六个月,两组的UDVA均有显着改善(所有P <0.001;一种方差分析)。结论:飞秒激光在皮瓣厚度可预测性和视力速度方面优于微型角膜刀辅助的LASIK。复苏。在回归分析中,皮瓣厚度偏差增加与视力恢复之间存在负相关关系。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号