...
首页> 外文期刊>Civil and Environmental Research >Comparative Study of RCC Flat Slab and RCC Beam-and-Slab Floor Systems
【24h】

Comparative Study of RCC Flat Slab and RCC Beam-and-Slab Floor Systems

机译:碾压混凝土平板和碾压混凝土梁板楼板系统的比较研究

获取原文
           

摘要

A number of researchers have focused on comparative study of reinforced concrete flat slabs with post-tensioned and prestressed concrete flat slab and other types of floor systems. However, this research is focused on comparative study of RCC flat slab and RCC beam-and-slab floor systems. This topic was chosen because the RCC flat slab floor system has more benefits compared to the RCC beam-and-slab floor system but besides these benefits, it is less popular with designers in Ghana. There is however, no comparative cost analysis available to convince designers to adopt this option. This Research is therefore aimed to provide such information. These include the design of RCC Flat slab as well as RCC beam-and-slab floor systems and then comparing the results. Structural Designing Software (CSC TEDDS & RCC Excel Spreadsheet) and manual method were used for the analysis and design of both floor systems in accordance with BS 8110. From the analysis and design results of the office building, the total estimation for the quantities for a typical floor system is calculated. The procedure includes finding the quantities of concrete, reinforcing steel and formwork, and their cost according to the current unit rate for both cases. Results revealed that RCC flat slab floor system is +6.07% cost saving in floor construction and +2.42% in column construction, hence the most economic floor system. It was also found that the major cost significant saving item is formwork in case of RCC flat slab floor system compared to RCC beam-and-slab floor system.
机译:许多研究人员致力于将钢筋混凝土平板与后张和预应力混凝土平板以及其他类型的地板系统进行比较研究。但是,这项研究的重点是RCC平板和RCC梁板楼板系统的比较研究。选择该主题的原因是,与RCC横梁式楼板地板系统相比,RCC平板楼板地板系统具有更多的优势,但除了这些优点之外,它在加纳的设计师中并不那么受欢迎。但是,没有可用的比较成本分析来说服设计师采用此选项。因此,本研究旨在提供此类信息。其中包括RCC平板和RCC梁板楼板系统的设计,然后比较结果。根据BS 8110,使用结构设计软件(CSC TEDDS和RCC Excel Spreadsheet)和手动方法对两种地板系统进行分析和设计。从办公楼的分析和设计结果中,对办公楼的总数量进行估算。计算典型的地板系统。该过程包括根据两种情况下的当前单价查找混凝土,钢筋和模板的数量及其成本。结果表明,碾压混凝土平板楼板系统在楼板施工中可节省+ 6.07%的成本,在立柱施工中可节省+ 2.42%,因此是最经济的楼板系统。还发现,与RCC梁板楼板系统相比,RCC平板楼板系统的主要成本节省项是模板。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号