...
首页> 外文期刊>Chronic respiratory disease. >Discriminant validity of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, Beck Depression Inventory (II) and Beck Anxiety Inventory to confirmed clinical diagnosis of depression and anxiety in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
【24h】

Discriminant validity of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, Beck Depression Inventory (II) and Beck Anxiety Inventory to confirmed clinical diagnosis of depression and anxiety in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

机译:医院焦虑和抑郁量表,贝克抑郁量表(II)和贝克焦虑量表对慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者抑郁和焦虑的临床诊断的判别有效性

获取原文
           

摘要

The objective of this study was to investigate the discriminant validity of commonly used depression and anxiety screening tools in order to determine the most suitable tool for patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). COPD patients (n = 56) completed the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), Beck Depression Inventory (BDI-II) and Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI). These scores were compared to confirmed clinical diagnoses of depression and anxiety using the Mini Neuropsychiatric Interview. HADS depression subscale (HADS-D) sensitivity/specificity was 78/81%; BDI-II 89/77%; HADS anxiety subscale (HADS-A) 71/81%; and BAI 89/62%. HADS-D sensitivity/specificity was improved (100/83%) with the removal of Q4 ‘I feel as if I am slowed down’ and adjusted cut-off (≥5). Removal of BDI-II Q21 ‘Loss of interest in sex’ with adjusted cut-off ≥12 resulted in similar improvement (100/79%). No problematic items were identified for HADS-A or BAI. Previously reported low sensitivity/specificity of the HADS for COPD patients was not replicated. Furthermore, simple modifications of the HADS-D markedly improved sensitivity/specificity for depression. BDI-II, HADS-A and BAI produced acceptable sensitivity/specificity unmodified. Pending further research for COPD patients we recommend continued use of the HADS-A with standard cut-off (≥8) and removal of Q4 of the HADS-D with lower cut-off ≥5.
机译:这项研究的目的是调查常用抑郁和焦虑筛查工具的判别有效性,以便确定最适合慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)患者的工具。 COPD患者(n = 56)完成了医院焦虑抑郁量表(HADS),贝克抑郁量表(BDI-II)和贝克焦虑量表(BAI)。使用Mini Neuropsychiatric Interview将这些得分与已确认的抑郁症和焦虑症临床诊断进行比较。 HADS抑郁量表(HADS-D)的敏感性/特异性为78/81%; BDI-II 89/77%; HADS焦虑量表(HADS-A)71/81%;和BAI 89/62%。通过删除第4季度“感觉好像我放慢了速度”并调整了截止值(≥5),HADS-D的敏感性/特异性得到了改善(100/83%)。去除BDI-II Q21“对性的兴趣降低”且调整后的截止值≥12导致了类似的改善(100/79%)。没有发现HADS-A或BAI有问题的项目。先前报道的HADS对COPD患者的低敏感性/特异性没有被复制。此外,对HADS-D的简单修改可显着改善抑郁症的敏感性/特异性。 BDI-II,HADS-A和BAI产生了可接受的未经修饰的敏感性/特异性。在对COPD患者进行进一步研究之前,我们建议继续使用具有标准截断值(≥8)的HADS-A和去除具有较低截断值≥5的HADS-D的Q4。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号