Assuming that sound methodological indications regarding the evaluation of health promotion programs should be rooted in a critical reflection on the nature of health pro'/> On the nature of programs: health promotion programs as action
首页> 外文期刊>Ciencia e Saude Coletiva >On the nature of programs: health promotion programs as action
【24h】

On the nature of programs: health promotion programs as action

机译:关于方案的性质:将健康促进方案作为行动

获取原文
           

摘要

>Assuming that sound methodological indications regarding the evaluation of health promotion programs should be rooted in a critical reflection on the nature of health promotion programs, this paper reviews two traditional ontological perspectives at the basis of most scientific activity. While empirical realism conceptualises programs as natural objects, idealism and relativism strictly confine programs in the realm of representations and models. Both ontological perspectives however are unsatisfying for health promotion programs. It is suggested that critical realism which proposes a three-layer ontology offers a better framework for conceiving health promotion programs. In this ontology, the nature of programs lies in actions undertaken to create the conditions by which social causal mechanisms are triggered. Ultimately locating programs in the realm of practice.
机译:> 假设有关健康促进计划评估的合理方法论应植根于对健康促进计划本质的批判性反思,本文将对这两个传统的本体论观点进行回顾。最科学活动的基础。经验现实主义将程序概念化为自然对象,而理想主义和相对主义则严格地将程序限制在表示和模型领域。然而,两种本体论观点都不能令人满意地促进健康。建议提出三层本体的批判现实主义为构思健康促进计划提供了更好的框架。在这种本体中,程序的本质在于为创造触发社会因果机制的条件而采取的行动。最终将程序定位在实践领域。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号