首页> 外文期刊>Chemistry Education Research and Practice >Assessing changes in high school students' conceptual understanding through concept maps before and after the computer-based predict–observe–explain (CB-POE) tasks on acid–base chemistry at the secondary level
【24h】

Assessing changes in high school students' conceptual understanding through concept maps before and after the computer-based predict–observe–explain (CB-POE) tasks on acid–base chemistry at the secondary level

机译:在中学阶段基于计算机的基于酸的化学的预测-观察-解释(CB-POE)任务之前和之后,通过概念图评估高中学生的概念理解的变化

获取原文
       

摘要

Although concept maps have been used as alternative assessment methods in education, there has been an ongoing debate on how to evaluate students' concept maps. This study discusses how to evaluate students' concept maps as an assessment tool before and after 15 computer-based Predicta€“Observea€“Explain (CB-POE) tasks related to acida€“base chemistry. 12 high school students participated in this study. Students' concept maps were evaluated taking into account three parts: qualitative, quantitative and representational level. The results gathered from the quantitative analysis of the pre and post concept maps were analyzed using SPSS 17.0. The results showed that there is a significant difference between students' pre and post concept map scores (z = 3.05; p 0.05). From the qualitative analysis of the concept maps, the majority of the students constructed their pre and post concept maps non-hierarchically; while they drew more interconnected concept maps after the CB-POE tasks. Regarding their representational level, the students used the macroscopic level more often than microscopic and symbolic levels in both their pre and post concept maps. Nonetheless, they increased the number of macroscopic, microscopic and symbolic level representations in their post concept maps. The paper concludes with suggestions and implications for educators and researchers to improve the quality of concept map evaluation.
机译:尽管概念图已被用作教育中的替代评估方法,但有关如何评估学生的概念图的争论一直在进行。这项研究讨论了如何在15种基于计算机的与酸基础化学有关的Predicta“ Observea”解释(CB-POE)任务之前和之后如何评估学生的概念图。 12名高中生参加了这项研究。根据三个部分对学生的概念图进行了评估:定性,定量和代表性水平。使用SPSS 17.0分析了概念图前后的定量分析收集的结果。结果表明,学生的概念图谱前后得分之间存在显着差异(z = 3.05; p <0.05)。通过对概念图的定性分析,大多数学生非分层地构造了他们的前后概念图。在CB-POE任务完成后,他们绘制了更多相互关联的概念图。关于他们的代表性水平,学生在概念图的前后都使用了宏观层次,而不是微观层次和象征层次。但是,他们在后期概念图中增加了宏观,微观和符号级别表示的数量。本文最后提出了对教育者和研究人员提高概念图评估质量的建议和启示。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号