...
首页> 外文期刊>Chemistry Education Research and Practice >Are creative comparisons developed by prospective chemistry teachers evidence of their conceptual understanding? The case of inter- and intramolecular forces
【24h】

Are creative comparisons developed by prospective chemistry teachers evidence of their conceptual understanding? The case of inter- and intramolecular forces

机译:准化学老师进行的创造性比较是否证明了他们对概念的理解?分子间和分子内力的情况

获取原文
           

摘要

The aim of this study is to determine prospective chemistry teachers' creative comparisons about the basic concepts of inter- and intramolecular forces, and to uncover the relationship between these creative comparisons and prospective teachers' conceptual understanding. Based on a phenomenological research method, this study was conducted with 101 prospective chemistry teachers studying in the Chemistry Education Department at a state university in Turkey in the academic year 2011a€“2012. The research made use of two data collection instruments, a creative comparison questionnaire and semi-structured interviews. The concepts of a€?non-polar covalent bonds, dipolea€“dipole force, hydrogen bonds, ionic bonds, covalent bonds, polar covalent bonds, and van der Waals forcea€? were set out in the creative comparison questionnaire and the prospective teachers were asked to complete the sentences about these concepts (example: ionic bond is like .......... because ...........). Content analysis techniques were employed in the analysis of the creative comparisons set out in the questionnaire. The analysis of the data revealed that the prospective teachers generally developed their creative comparisons based on the formation and strength of the different bonds and that they also had alternative conceptions, particularly regarding the formation of covalent bonds, hydrogen bonds, and the van der Waals force. Semi-structured interviews were conducted in order to learn more about this and obtain detailed information about the level of understanding of the prospective teachers. Twelve prospective teachers were selected for the interviews on the basis of the creative comparisons they had developed in the creative comparison questionnaire. The analysis of the interviews showed that the level of conceptual understanding of the prospective teachers was not tightly linked to the complexity of their creative comparisons. However, it was seen that the creative comparisons submitted by the prospective teachers could be used to infer their conceptual understanding. Also, these creative comparisons could be helpful in determining what the prospective teachers' alternative conceptions were.
机译:这项研究的目的是确定前瞻化学教师关于分子间和分子内力基本概念的创造性比较,并揭示这些创造性比较与未来教师的概念理解之间的关系。基于现象学研究方法,本研究由2011年至2012学年在土耳其国立大学化学教育系学习的101位准化学老师进行。这项研究利用了两种数据收集工具,一个创造性的比较问卷和半结构化访谈。非极性共价键,偶极力,氢键,离子键,共价键,极性共价键和范德华力的概念。在创造性的比较问卷中列出,要求准教师填写有关这些概念的句子(例如:离子键就像.... )。内容分析技术用于调查表中提出的创造性比较的分析。对数据的分析表明,准教师通常根据不同键的形成和强度进行创造性的比较,并且他们还有其他选择,特别是关于共价键,氢键和范德华力的形成。 。进行了半结构化访谈,以了解更多信息并获得有关准教师的理解水平的详细信息。根据他们在创意比较调查表中进行的创意比较,选择了十二名准教师进行访谈。对访谈的分析表明,对准教师的概念理解水平与他们的创造性比较的复杂性没有紧密联系。但是,可以看出,准教师提交的创造性比较可以用来推断他们的概念理解。同样,这些创造性的比较可能有助于确定准教师的替代观念是什么。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号