...
首页> 外文期刊>Chest Disease Reports >Cuff leak tests: analysis of diagnostic accuracy in observational cohorts of patients with acute respiratory failure
【24h】

Cuff leak tests: analysis of diagnostic accuracy in observational cohorts of patients with acute respiratory failure

机译:袖套漏气测试:急性呼吸衰竭患者的观察组的诊断准确性分析

获取原文
           

摘要

Cuff leak tests provide clinicians with information about upper airway narrowing and may help predict weaning success. However, most clinical trials reporting this measurement are small, and the utility of this test remains uncertain. We identified all clinical studies using cuff leak tests in the PubMed, Google Scholar, EMBASE, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials databases using multiple search terms, including cuff leak test, laryngeal edema, extubation , and stridor , and abstracted quantitative information on cuff leaks and outcomes (stridor and reintubation). We reviewed six studies which included 958 patients with acute respiratory failure in intensive care units. Eighty-two patients (8.5%) had postextubation stridor. The weighted mean cuff leak was 119 (±51) mls in the patients with stridor and 313 (±24) mls in patients without stridor (P<0.01). Sixty-six patients required reintubation. The presence of stridor had a sensitivity of 0.60 (95% CI 0.48-0.72), a specificity of 0.96 (95% CI 0.94-0.97), and a positive likelihood ratio of 13.4 (95% CI 6.9-25.7) for predicting reintubation. No single clinical parameter consistently predicted stridor. Patients with postextubation stridor have smaller cuff leak volumes than patients who do not have stridor and are more likely to require reintubation. Cuff leak measurements can improve decision making with extubation protocols.
机译:袖带泄漏测试可为临床医生提供有关上呼吸道变窄的信息,并可帮助预测断奶成功。但是,大多数报告此测量的临床试验很小,并且该试验的用途仍不确定。我们在PubMed,Google Scholar,EMBASE和Cochrane对照试验中央注册数据库中使用多个搜索词(包括袖带漏气测试,喉头水肿,拔管和stridor)确定了所有使用袖带漏气测试的临床研究,并提取了袖带定量信息泄漏和结局(绞痛和再次插管)。我们回顾了六项研究,其中包括重症监护病房的958例急性呼吸衰竭患者。八十二例(8.5%)拔管后喘鸣。窒息性患者的袖带加权平均泄漏为119(±51)mls,非窒息性患者为313(±24)mls(P <0.01)。 66位患者需要重新插管。喘鸣的存在敏感性为0.60(95%CI 0.48-0.72),特异性为0.96(95%CI 0.94-0.97),正预测可能性为13.4(95%CI 6.9-25.7)。没有单一的临床参数能够一致地预测喘鸣。拔管后大跨度患者的袖带漏气量比无呼吸管大且需要再插管的患者小。袖带泄漏测量可以改善拔管方案的决策。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号