...
首页> 外文期刊>Cardiovascular Ultrasound >Improved cardiovascular diagnostic accuracy by pocket size imaging device in non-cardiologic outpatients: the NaUSiCa (Naples Ultrasound Stethoscope in Cardiology) study
【24h】

Improved cardiovascular diagnostic accuracy by pocket size imaging device in non-cardiologic outpatients: the NaUSiCa (Naples Ultrasound Stethoscope in Cardiology) study

机译:非心脏病门诊病人的袖珍影像设备提高了心血管诊断的准确性:NaUSiCa(心脏内科那不勒斯超声听诊器)研究

获取原文
           

摘要

Miniaturization has evolved in the creation of a pocket-size imaging device which can be utilized as an ultrasound stethoscope. This study assessed the additional diagnostic power of pocket size device by both experts operators and trainees in comparison with physical examination and its appropriateness of use in comparison with standard echo machine in a non-cardiologic population. Three hundred four consecutive non cardiologic outpatients underwent a sequential assessment including physical examination, pocket size imaging device and standard Doppler-echo exam. Pocket size device was used by both expert operators and trainees (who received specific training before the beginning of the study). All the operators were requested to give only visual, qualitative insights on specific issues. All standard Doppler-echo exams were performed by expert operators. One hundred two pocket size device exams were performed by experts and two hundred two by trainees. The time duration of the pocket size device exam was 304 ± 117 sec. Diagnosis of cardiac abnormalities was made in 38.2% of cases by physical examination and in 69.7% of cases by physical examination + pocket size device (additional diagnostic power = 31.5%, p In conclusion, pocket size device showed a relevant additional diagnostic value in comparison with physical examination. Sensitivity and specificity were good in experts and suboptimal in trainees. Specificity was particularly influenced by the level of experience. Training programs are needed for pocket size device users.
机译:小型化已发展成为可用于超声听诊器的袖珍型成像设备。这项研究评估了专家操作员和受训人员与体格检查相比,口袋大小设备的附加诊断能力,以及与非心脏疾病人群相比,与标准回声仪相比,其使用适当性。 344名连续的非心脏病门诊患者接受了包括体格检查,袖珍大小成像设备和标准多普勒回声检查在内的连续评估。便携式操作员和受训人员(在研究开始之前均接受了专门培训)都使用了袖珍型设备。要求所有操作员仅对特定问题提供直观,定性的见解。所有标准的多普勒回声检查均由专业操作员执行。专家进行了122次袖珍设备考试,而学员则进行了22次考试。袖珍型设备检查的持续时间为304±117秒。体格检查诊断为心脏异常的比例为38.2%,体格检查+袖珍仪器诊断为69.7%(附加诊断力= 31.5%,p)总的来说,相比而言,袖珍仪器显示出相关的附加诊断价值通过体检,专家的敏感性和专一性良好,而受训者则不佳,专一性尤其受经验水平的影响,袖珍型设备用户需要培训计划。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号