首页> 外文期刊>Cardiology Journal >Safety and efficacy of early radiofrequency catheter ablation in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation complicated with amiodarone-induced thyrotoxicosis
【24h】

Safety and efficacy of early radiofrequency catheter ablation in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation complicated with amiodarone-induced thyrotoxicosis

机译:阵发性心房颤动并胺碘酮致甲状腺毒症的早期射频消融术的安全性和有效性

获取原文
           

摘要

Background: Amiodarone is an antiarrhythmic drug that is frequently used to control atrial fibrillation (AF). Many patients with AF are afraid of the risk of ablation and take amiodarone, some patients develop amiodarone-induced thyrotoxicosis (AIT). The purpose of the study was to investigate the safety and efficacy of early radiofrequency catheter ablation in patients with paroxysmal AF complicated with AIT. Methods: From the 146 consecutive patients with paroxysmal AF who had been treated with amiodarone and underwent 3-dimensional mapping system guided circumferential pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) at our center from January 2013 to June 2014, 20 had developed AIT. Thirty controls with normal thyroid function and matched for baseline characteristics were selected. Results: Pulmonary vein isolation was completed in all patients without serious complications and with similar procedural (170.60 ± 14.80 vs. 158.18 ± 9.06 min; p = 0.062) and X-ray exposure (16.48 ± 2.15 vs. 15.36 ± 1.57 min; p = 0.058) time in AIT vs. control groups; however, upon coronary sinus catheter pacing (from 300 ms to 200 ms) after intravenous isoproterenol administration 30 min post PVI, rates of induction of AF (35% vs. 3.33%; p = 0.005) and of non-pulmonary vein-related atrial tachyarrhythmias (50% vs. 6.67%; p = 0.01) were higher, while those for atrial flutter (15% vs. 3.33%; p = 0.17) and atrial tachycardia (15% vs. 6.67%; p = 0.31) were similar, as was the recovery of conduction of pulmonary vein potential (15% vs. 30%; p = 0.191). In AIT vs. control group, atrial tachyarrhythmia recurrence rate was higher at 3 months (45% vs. 16.67%, p = 0.032) but not between 3 and 12 months (30% vs. 23.33%; p = 0.418) follow-up. Conclusions: Early catheter ablation for paroxysmal AF in patients with AIT appeared safe and effective albeit with higher atrial tachyarrhythmia recurrence rate up to 3 months but not beyond 12 months after PVI relative to controls.
机译:背景:胺碘酮是一种抗心律失常药物,通常用于控制心房颤动(AF)。许多房颤患者害怕消融的危险并服用胺碘酮,一些患者发生胺碘酮诱发的甲状腺毒症(AIT)。这项研究的目的是探讨阵发性AF合并AIT的早期射频导管消融的安全性和有效性。方法:2013年1月至2014年6月,在我中心接受146例连续的阵发性AF患者接受胺碘酮治疗并行3维标测系统指导的圆周肺静脉隔离(PVI),其中20例发展为AIT。选择三十名甲状腺功能正常且基线特征匹配的对照。结果:所有患者均完成了肺静脉隔离,无严重并发症,并且程序相似(170.60±14.80 vs. 158.18±9.06 min; p = 0.062)和X射线照射(16.48±2.15 vs. 15.36±1.57 min; p = AIT与对照组相比,时间为0.058);然而,在静脉注射异丙肾上腺素后30分钟,在静脉注射异丙肾上腺素后,从冠状静脉窦导管起搏(300毫秒至200毫秒)时,房颤和非肺静脉相关房颤的诱发率(35%vs. 3.33%; p = 0.005)快速心律失常(50%vs. 6.67%; p = 0.01)较高,而房扑(15%vs. 3.33%; p = 0.17)和心动过速(15%vs. 6.67%; p = 0.31)相似。 ,肺静脉电位传导的恢复也是如此(15%比30%; p = 0.191)。在AIT与对照组相比,随访3个月时房性心律失常的复发率更高(45%对16.67%,p = 0.032),但在3到12个月之间不高(30%对23.33%; p = 0.418)。 。结论:AIT患者阵发性AF的早期导管消融似乎是安全有效的,尽管相对于对照组,PVI后3个月但不超过12个月的房性心律失常复发率更高。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号