...
首页> 外文期刊>Canadian Urological Association Journal >Minimally invasive surgical treatment for large impacted upper ureteral stones: Ureteroscopic lithotripsy or percutaneous nephrolithotomy?
【24h】

Minimally invasive surgical treatment for large impacted upper ureteral stones: Ureteroscopic lithotripsy or percutaneous nephrolithotomy?

机译:大面积上输尿管结石的微创手术治疗:输尿管镜碎石术或经皮肾镜取石术?

获取原文
           

摘要

Introduction: The management of patients with large impacted upper ureteral stones is difficu there is no standard treatment. We compared the outcomes of percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) and ureteroscopic lithotripsy (UL) to treat large (≥1.5 cm), impacted, upper ureteral stones. Methods: In total, 86 patients with large impacted upper ureteral stones were included in this study. Of these patients 41 underwent UL and 45 underwent PCNL. The inclusion criteria were: longest diameter of stone ≥1.5 cm, the localization of stone between the lower border of L4 spine and ureteropelvic junction and impacted stone. Results: In the UL group, we were unable to reach the stone in 3 patients because of ureteral stricture and edema despite balloon dilation. Of these 3 patients, we were unable to optimally visualize the stone in 2 patients due to bleeding and mucosal injury following balloon dilation. The stricture was too firm and could not be passed in the third patient. Also in the UL group, 15 patients had stones or big fragments which migrated into the renal collecting system. In the PCNL group, 21 patients had concurrent renal stones <1 cm and stones were successfully removed in all patients. No statistically significant difference was found between groups in terms of operation time. Mean hospital stay was significantly shorter in the UL group. Success rates were 82.3% in the UL group and 97.6% in the PCNL group ( p = 0.001). Conclusion: The recent study confirms that PCNL is a safe and effective minimally invasive procedure with acceptable complication rates in the treatment of patients with large, impacted upper ureteral stones.
机译:简介:上输尿管结石较大的患者难以治疗;没有标准的治疗方法。我们比较了经皮肾镜取石术(PCNL)和输尿管镜碎石术(UL)治疗大(≥1.5cm),受累上部输尿管结石的结果。方法:本研究共纳入86例大面积上输尿管结石受累患者。在这些患者中,有41位接受了UL治疗,有45位接受了PCNL治疗。纳入标准为:最长石块直径≥1.5cm,L4脊柱下缘与输尿管盆腔交界处和受累结石之间的结石定位。结果:在UL组中,尽管有球囊扩张,但由于输尿管狭窄和水肿,在3例患者中我们仍未触及结石。在这3例患者中,由于球囊扩张后的出血和粘膜损伤,我们无法对2例患者的结石进行最佳可视化。狭窄过紧,第三位患者无法通过。同样在UL组中,有15名患者的结石或大碎片迁移到肾脏收集系统。在PCNL组中,有21例患者并发肾结石<1 cm,所有患者均成功清除了结石。在手术时间方面,两组之间没有发现统计学上的显着差异。 UL组的平均住院时间明显缩短。 UL组的成功率为82.3%,PCNL组的成功率为97.6%(p = 0.001)。结论:最近的研究证实,PCNL是治疗大的,受影响的上输尿管结石患者的安全有效的微创手术,并发症发生率可接受。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号