首页> 外文期刊>Cadernos de Saúde Pública >Validity of pre and post-term birth rates based on the date of last menstrual period compared to early obstetric ultrasonography
【24h】

Validity of pre and post-term birth rates based on the date of last menstrual period compared to early obstetric ultrasonography

机译:根据末次月经日期与早期产科超声检查比较的早产和产后出生率的有效性

获取原文
           

摘要

The aim of this study was to assess the validity of the last menstrual period (LMP) estimate in determining pre and post-term birth rates, in a prenatal cohort from two Brazilian cities, São Luís and Ribeirão Preto. Pregnant women with a single fetus and less than 20 weeks' gestation by obstetric ultrasonography who received prenatal care in 2010 and 2011 were included. The LMP was obtained on two occasions (at 22-25 weeks gestation and after birth). The sensitivity of LMP obtained prenatally to estimate the preterm birth rate was 65.6% in São Luís and 78.7% in Ribeirão Preto and the positive predictive value was 57.3% in São Luís and 73.3% in Ribeirão Preto. LMP errors in identifying preterm birth were lower in the more developed city, Ribeirão Preto. The sensitivity and positive predictive value of LMP for the estimate of the post-term birth rate was very low and tended to overestimate it. LMP can be used with some errors to identify the preterm birth rate when obstetric ultrasonography is not available, but is not suitable for predicting post-term birth.
机译:这项研究的目的是评估来自两个巴西城市圣路易斯和里贝拉朗·普雷图的产前队列中,最后一次月经(LMP)估算值在确定早产和产后出生率方面的有效性。包括单胎和妊娠少于20周的产科超声检查的孕妇,她们在2010年和2011年接受了产前检查。 LMP是在两种情况下(妊娠22-25周和出生后)获得的。产前获得的LMP估计早产率的敏感性在圣路易斯为65.6%,在里贝朗·普雷图为78.7%,在圣路易斯的阳性预测值为57.3%,在里贝朗·普雷图为73.3%。在较发达的城市里贝朗·普雷图(RibeirãoPreto),识别早产的LMP错误较低。 LMP对估计早产率的敏感性和阳性预测值非常低,并且往往高估了它。当无法获得产科超声检查时,LMP可能会出现一些错误,以识别早产率,但不适用于预测早产。

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号