...
首页> 外文期刊>Cadernos de Saúde Pública >Procedimiento estratégico en tres fases para la selección de variables, con el fin de obtener resultados equilibrados en investigación sobre salud públicaProcedimento estratégico em três estágios de sele??o de variáveis para a obten??o de resultados equil
【24h】

Procedimiento estratégico en tres fases para la selección de variables, con el fin de obtener resultados equilibrados en investigación sobre salud públicaProcedimento estratégico em três estágios de sele??o de variáveis para a obten??o de resultados equil

机译:为了在公共卫生研究中获得均衡的结果,分三个阶段选择战略程序,以获取公平的结果。

获取原文
           

摘要

Multidisciplinary research in public health is approached using methods from many scientific disciplines. One of the main characteristics of this type of research is dealing with large data sets. Classic statistical variable selection methods, known as “screen and clean”, and used in a single-step, select the variables with greater explanatory weight in the model. These methods, commonly used in public health research, may induce masking and multicollinearity, excluding relevant variables for the experts in each discipline and skewing the result. Some specific techniques are used to solve this problem, such as penalized regressions and Bayesian statistics, they offer more balanced results among subsets of variables, but with less restrictive selection thresholds. Using a combination of classical methods, a three-step procedure is proposed in this manuscript, capturing the relevant variables of each scientific discipline, minimizing the selection of variables in each of them and obtaining a balanced distribution that explains most of the variability. This procedure was applied on a dataset from a public health research. Comparing the results with the single-step methods, the proposed method shows a greater reduction in the number of variables, as well as a balanced distribution among the scientific disciplines associated with the response variable. We propose an innovative procedure for variable selection and apply it to our dataset. Furthermore, we compare the new method with the classic single-step procedures.
机译:公共卫生的多学科研究是使用许多科学学科的方法进行的。这类研究的主要特征之一是处理大型数据集。单步使用经典的统计变量选择方法(称为“筛选和清除”)来选择模型中具有较大解释权重的变量。这些在公共卫生研究中常用的方法可能会引起掩盖和多重共线性,不包括各学科专家的相关变量并歪曲结果。一些特定的技术用于解决此问题,例如惩罚回归和贝叶斯统计,它们在变量子集之间提供了更为均衡的结果,但选择阈值较少。使用经典方法的组合,本手稿中提出了一个三步过程,该过程捕获每个科学学科的相关变量,最小化每个变量中对变量的选择,并获得解释大多数可变性的平衡分布。该程序应用于来自公共卫生研究的数据集。将结果与单步方法进行比较,所提出的方法显示出变量数量的更大减少,以及与响应变量相关的科学学科之间的均衡分布。我们提出了一种创新的变量选择程序,并将其应用于我们的数据集。此外,我们将新方法与经典的单步过程进行了比较。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号